Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Basic science, science, and medical education.

Lancet (London, England)

|January 17, 1976

Summary

Medical education should integrate more basic science to enhance rational medical practice. Critiques of modern medicine often stem from insufficient scientific understanding, not an excess of science.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Dirofilariasis mouse models for heartworm preclinical research.

Frontiers in microbiology·2023

Same author

A Case of Renal Asthma.

Postgraduate medical journal·2011

Same author

On the probability of a committee meeting.

British medical journal·2010

Same author

Pharmacokinetic differences in exposure to camphor after intraruminal dosing in selectively bred lines of goats.

Journal of animal science·2010

Same author

Development of predictive models for airflow obstruction in alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency.

American journal of epidemiology·2009

Same author

Phosphorylated c-Src in the nucleus is associated with improved patient outcome in ER-positive breast cancer.

British journal of cancer·2008

Area of Science:

Medical Education
Philosophy of Science
Basic Sciences

Background:

Medical students traditionally learn basic sciences for rational practice.
The explanatory power of science, particularly through Popperian views, offers more benefits.
Current educational approaches may hinder the acquisition of scientific understanding.

Purpose of the Study:

To argue for a deeper integration of science in medical education.
To re-evaluate criticisms of modern medicine concerning the role of science.
To highlight the importance of understanding the nature of science.

Main Methods:

Conceptual analysis based on the philosophy of science (Popper).
Critique of traditional and modern medical education curricula.
Examination of common criticisms leveled against contemporary medicine.

Main Results:

Science offers more explanatory power than traditionally recognized in medicine.
Misplaced criticisms of modern medicine arise from a deficit, not surplus, of scientific understanding.
Appreciation of the nature of science is often incidental in current educational settings.

Conclusions:

Medical education requires a more robust inclusion of basic sciences for enhanced rationality.
Understanding the nature of science is crucial for both medical practice and accurate critique.
The perceived "excess" of science in medicine is a misinterpretation; a greater emphasis is needed.

Related Experiment Videos