Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Death as an event: a commentary on Robert Morison.

L R Kass

    Science (New York, N.Y.)
    |August 20, 1971
    PubMed
    Summary

    We can still define death as an event and establish criteria for determining death. We need to prioritize the dying patient

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Triumph or tragedy? The moral meaning of genetic technology.

    The American journal of jurisprudence·2006
    Same author

    Why we should ban the cloning of human beings.

    Texas review of law & politics·2005
    Same author

    The wisdom of repugnance: why we should ban the cloning of humans.

    Valparaiso University law review. Valparaiso University. School of Law·2003
    Same author

    Ban stand: cloning's big test.

    New republic (New York, N.Y.)·2002
    Same author

    L'Chaim and its limits: why not immortality?

    First things (New York, N.Y.)·2002
    Same author

    Preventing a brave new world: why we should ban human cloning now.

    New republic (New York, N.Y.)·2002

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Ethics
    • Thanatology
    • Bioethics

    Background:

    • Technological advancements in medicine have raised complex ethical questions regarding the definition and determination of death.
    • The increasing focus on life-sustaining technologies may inadvertently dehumanize the end-of-life experience.
    • Societal interests and the needs of third parties can complicate the care of dying patients.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To argue for the continued validity of defining death as a distinct event.
    • To advocate for a renewed focus on the humanistic aspects of end-of-life care.
    • To caution against the undue influence of external interests on end-of-life decisions.

    Main Methods:

    • Philosophical and ethical analysis of medical practices.
    • Review of ethical principles in patient care.
    • Critical examination of the impact of medical technology on humanistic values.

    Main Results:

    • The concept of death as an event remains viable and essential.
    • Establishing clear criteria for determining death is still necessary.
    • Prioritizing the dying patient's human needs is paramount.

    Conclusions:

    • Ethical frameworks for determining death should be maintained.
    • End-of-life care requires a compassionate, patient-centered approach, free from external pressures.
    • The dehumanizing effects of medical technology on the dying process must be acknowledged and addressed.

    Related Experiment Videos