Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Why Marshall-Marchetti operation works . . . or does not.

S Raz, A J Maggio, J J Kaufman

    Urology
    |August 1, 1979
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    A novel phospholipid derivative of indomethacin, DP-155 [mixture of 1-steroyl and 1-palmitoyl-2-{6-[1-(p-chlorobenzoyl)-5-methoxy-2-methyl-3-indolyl acetamido]hexanoyl}-sn-glycero-3-phosophatidyl [corrected] choline], shows superior safety and similar efficacy in reducing brain amyloid beta in an Alzheimer's disease model.

    The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics·2006
    Same author

    New millennium, new slings.

    Current urology reports·2002
    Same author

    Polypropylene sling for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence.

    Urology·2001
    Same author

    Neonatal hypoxic risk in preterm birth infants: the influence of sex and severity of respiratory distress on cognitive recovery.

    Neuropsychology·2001
    Same author

    Fixed and dynamic urethral compression for the treatment of post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence: is history repeating itself?

    The Journal of urology·2001
    Same author

    Diagnostic imaging of pelvic floor dysfunction.

    Current opinion in urology·2001
    Same journal

    Editorial Comment on "A Histopathologic Assessment of Prostate Ductal Anatomy in Relation to Micro-Ultrasound".

    Urology·2026
    Same journal

    Same-Day Discharge Following Multiport Robot-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy: A Prospective Feasibility Study of Outcomes, Costs, and Post-Discharge Healthcare Utilization.

    Urology·2026
    Same journal

    Extended versus Standard Lymph Node Dissection at the Time of Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer.

    Urology·2026
    Same journal

    Intractable Epistaxis and Severe Hypertension in a Young Woman.

    Urology·2026
    Same journal

    A 53-Year-Old Man with Elevated PSA and a Cystic Pelvic Lesion.

    Urology·2026
    Same journal

    Low-Grade, Papillary Bladder Tumors A plea for in-office fulguration.

    Urology·2026
    See all related articles

    Vesicourethral suspension operations can fail due to inadequate patient selection or technical surgical issues. Addressing these factors is crucial for successful outcomes in bladder neck and urethra procedures.

    Area of Science:

    • Urology
    • Surgical Techniques

    Background:

    • Vesicourethral suspension operations aim to correct urinary incontinence by altering urethrotrigonal anatomy.
    • These procedures establish a new balance of forces on the bladder neck and urethra.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To identify common reasons for failure in vesicourethral suspension operations.
    • To analyze factors contributing to suboptimal outcomes in surgical management of urinary incontinence.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of potential failure points in vesicourethral suspension surgery.
    • Categorization of failures based on preoperative evaluation and intraoperative technical aspects.

    Main Results:

    • Failures stem from insufficient preoperative assessment and patient selection.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Technical issues include incorrect anatomy correction, suture problems, adhesions, fibrosis, fistula, stone, or granuloma formation.
  • Overcorrection can also lead to procedural failure.
  • Conclusions:

    • Optimizing preoperative evaluation is essential for appropriate patient selection.
    • Meticulous surgical technique, addressing anatomical correction and suture management, is critical for preventing complications and ensuring procedural success.