Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A note of fixation during perimetry.

A Heijl, C E Krakau

    Acta Ophthalmologica
    |October 1, 1977
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Small eye movements during visual field testing can lead to inaccurate results. Automatic perimetry using random stimulus presentation helps prevent these errors, improving scotoma detection and measurement.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Optic disc classification by the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph and by physicians with varying experience of glaucoma.

    Eye (London, England)·2011
    Same author

    Focusing on glaucoma progression and the clinical importance of progression rate measurement: a review.

    Eye (London, England)·2010
    Same author

    The malmo high risk ocular hypertension study.

    Journal of glaucoma·2009
    Same author

    Arcuate cluster analysis in glaucoma perimetry.

    Journal of glaucoma·2009
    Same author

    Practical recommendations for measuring rates of visual field change in glaucoma.

    The British journal of ophthalmology·2008
    Same author

    Visual acuity and perimetry as measures of visual function in diabetic macular oedema.

    Diabetologia·2005

    Area of Science:

    • Ophthalmology
    • Visual Neuroscience
    • Medical Technology

    Background:

    • Kinetic perimetry can be influenced by small eye movements towards disappearing stimuli.
    • These movements may cause underestimation of visual field defects.
    • Automatic perimetry offers a potential solution by randomizing stimulus presentation.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate the impact of stimulus presentation logic on visual field defect detection.
    • To determine if random stimulus presentation in automatic perimetry mitigates errors caused by eye movements.
    • To evaluate the role of malfixation in visual field testing accuracy.

    Main Methods:

    • Comparison of two automatic perimetry logics: ordered vs. random stimulus presentation.
    • Analysis of scotoma size measurements under different presentation conditions.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Observation of patient eye movements during kinetic perimetry.

    • Main Results:

    • Ordered stimulus presentation in automatic perimetry may lead to a reduction in perceived scotoma size.
    • Random stimulus presentation effectively avoids the reduction in scotoma size.
    • The observed effect is likely attributable to malfixation, or inaccurate fixation.

    Conclusions:

    • Randomized stimulus presentation is crucial for accurate visual field defect assessment in automatic perimetry.
    • Malfixation can significantly influence perimetric results, particularly with ordered stimulus sequences.
    • Automatic perimetry with random logic enhances the reliability of scotoma detection and measurement.