Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Voting behavior of HSA interest groups: a case study.

R M Grossman

    American Journal of Public Health
    |December 1, 1978
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Consumers and providers exhibit distinct voting cohesion within Health Systems Agency (HSA) review committees. However, both groups share similar preferences for project review decisions, whether approving or denying proposals.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    A comparative trial of two retinoids commonly used in the treatment of acne vulgaris.

    The Journal of dermatological treatment·2002
    Same author

    Ketoconazole 2% shampoo in the treatment of tinea versicolor: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

    Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology·1998
    Same author

    Focus on fraud and abuse. How medical groups can avoid fraudulent billing practices.

    Patient accounts·1998
    Same author

    Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in a patient receiving long-term cyclosporin for the treatment of severe plaque psoriasis.

    The British journal of dermatology·1996
    Same author

    Long-term safety of cyclosporine in the treatment of psoriasis.

    Archives of dermatology·1996
    Same author

    A novel therapeutic approach to psoriasis with combination calcipotriol ointment and very low-dose cyclosporine: results of a multicenter placebo-controlled study.

    Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology·1994
    Same journal

    Erratum In: "Ogunbajo et al. Respond".

    American journal of public health·2026
    Same journal

    The Role of Gender in HIV Care Engagement Among Individuals Assigned Male Sex at Birth: Medical Monitoring Project, United States, 2015-2022.

    American journal of public health·2026
    Same journal

    Domestic Returns to Predictable US Participation in the World Health Organization: Health Security and Cost.

    American journal of public health·2026
    Same journal

    The Risks of Mortality, Cardiovascular Events, and Pulmonary Complications in Cancer Patients Who Smoke Cigarettes and Switch to E-Cigarettes: South Korea, 2015‒2022.

    American journal of public health·2026
    Same journal

    Retailers CARE Program in Montgomery County, Ohio, Partners With Alcohol, Tobacco, and Lottery Retailers to Promote Healthier Communities.

    American journal of public health·2026
    Same journal

    Trends in Sexual Activity, Condom Use, and Use of Pregnancy Prevention Methods Among Female Adolescents: United States, 2007-2023.

    American journal of public health·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Health services research
    • Health policy analysis
    • Public health administration

    Background:

    • Health Systems Agencies (HSAs) play a crucial role in healthcare planning and resource allocation.
    • Understanding the dynamics of voting behavior within HSA review committees is essential for effective governance.
    • Previous research has not fully explored the voting cohesion and decision preferences of consumer versus provider groups within HSAs.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To analyze the voting cohesion (solidarity) among consumer and provider groups on HSA review committees.
    • To determine the alignment of desired review decisions (approve or deny) between consumer and provider interest groups.
    • To provide insights into the decision-making processes within health system planning bodies.

    Main Methods:

    Related Experiment Videos

    • A case study approach was employed, examining 23 decisions from a large Health Systems Agency.
    • The Rice Index of voting cohesion was applied to quantify the solidarity within consumer and provider voting blocs.
    • Comparative analysis of voting patterns and decision outcomes was conducted.

    Main Results:

    • Significant differences were observed in the intra-group voting cohesion between consumer and provider members.
    • Despite differences in cohesion, both consumer and provider groups demonstrated similar preferences regarding the approval or denial of project reviews.
    • The study identified varying levels of solidarity within each group, suggesting distinct internal dynamics.

    Conclusions:

    • Consumer and provider groups exhibit differing levels of internal voting solidarity on HSA review committees.
    • The alignment in desired project review outcomes (approve/deny) suggests a convergence of interests on substantive decisions, irrespective of group affiliation.
    • These findings have implications for understanding stakeholder influence and decision-making in health system governance.