Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Disposable defibrillator electrodes.

G A Ewy, W J Horan, M D Ewy

    Heart & Lung : the Journal of Critical Care
    |January 1, 1977
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Disposable defibrillator electrode pads showed significantly higher transthoracic impedance compared to electrode paste. This increased impedance can reduce defibrillation current, leading to less effective electrical therapy.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Beta-Blockade and Response to Exercise: Influence of Training.

    The Physician and sportsmedicine·2016
    Same author

    Rationale for continuous chest compression cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

    Heart (British Cardiac Society)·2009
    Same author

    Neuroendocrine properties of intrinsic cardiac adrenergic cells in fetal rat heart.

    American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology·2004
    Same author

    Sympathetic reinnervation of the transplanted heart.

    The New England journal of medicine·2002
    Same author

    Adverse hemodynamic effects of interrupting chest compressions for rescue breathing during cardiopulmonary resuscitation for ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest.

    Circulation·2001
    Same author

    Cardiopulmonary resuscitation: strengthening the links in the chain of survival.

    Maryland medicine : MM : a publication of MEDCHI, the Maryland State Medical Society·2001
    Same journal

    Diagnosing heart failure through imaging.

    Heart & lung : the journal of critical care·2026
    Same journal

    Comparative utility of median household income, social vulnerability index, and social deprivation index in predicting heart failure-related emergency department revisits: A multi-hospital cohort study.

    Heart & lung : the journal of critical care·2026
    Same journal

    Predicting in-hospital mortality in AECOPD: A comparison of the mSOFA score with DECAF, Ottawa, and GOLD classifications.

    Heart & lung : the journal of critical care·2026
    Same journal

    Diagnostic accuracy of serological tests and biomarkers for hypersensitivity pneumonitis: A systematic review.

    Heart & lung : the journal of critical care·2026
    Same journal

    Associations of genetic risk factors and air pollution with incident pulmonary embolism: a prospective cohort study in the UK Biobank.

    Heart & lung : the journal of critical care·2026
    Same journal

    Impaired hemostasis in mechanical circulatory support systems: Monitoring with T-TAS® 01, in vitro correction with VWF concentrates, and impact of membrane oxygenators.

    Heart & lung : the journal of critical care·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Cardiovascular Research
    • Biomedical Engineering
    • Emergency Medicine

    Background:

    • Transthoracic impedance is a critical factor influencing the effectiveness of direct-current defibrillation.
    • Current defibrillator technology and electrode interface materials significantly impact energy delivery.
    • Optimizing transthoracic impedance is essential for achieving successful defibrillation, particularly in heavier patients.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To compare the transthoracic impedance of disposable defibrillator electrode pads against traditional electrode paste.
    • To evaluate the impact of different energy settings on impedance measurements.
    • To determine the most effective electrode interface for defibrillation and cardioversion.

    Main Methods:

    • Twenty-four mongrel dogs were used to assess transthoracic impedance during defibrillation.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Disposable electrode pads (SAF-D-FIB and DEFIB-PADS) were compared with electrode paste.
  • Defibrillation shocks were delivered at 100 and 400 watt-second settings.

    • Main Results:

    • Disposable electrode pads resulted in significantly higher transthoracic impedance than electrode paste at both energy settings (p < 0.001 and p < 0.01).
    • At 100 watt-seconds, SAF-D-FIB impedance was 59 ± 6 ohms vs. 46 ± 6 ohms for paste; DEFIB-PADS impedance was 57 ± 5 ohms vs. 50 ± 5 ohms for paste.
    • Higher impedances with disposable electrodes can lead to reduced peak current delivery.

    Conclusions:

    • Disposable defibrillator electrodes exhibit higher transthoracic impedance compared to electrode paste.
    • The increased impedance associated with disposable electrodes may compromise defibrillation efficacy.
    • Electrode paste is recommended over these disposable electrodes for defibrillation and elective cardioversion.