The effect of errors of diagnosis and frequency of examination on reported rates of disease
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 25, 2026

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
Abstract:
Follow-up studies of certain diseases such as cervical dysplasia and carcinoma in situ may employ repeated screening to determine disease incidence in selected cohorts. Where errors of diagnosis occur, the true cohort experience will be distorted by an amount dependent upon the frequency of screening and the magnitude of the probabilities of incorrect diagnoses. These effects are investigated through a simple model of follow-up which employs three basic assumptions: that the probability of false positive and false negative diagnoses are constant; that individuals diagnosed as positive are treated and removed from the study, irrespective of whether or not they actually have the disease; and that fixed intervals occur between follow-up exams. The analysis permits one to assess the amount of bias introduced, and numerical examples are provided.
Related Concept Videos
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Data Reporting and Recording
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Introduction to Epidemiology
Prevalence and Incidence
Prevalence indicates the proportion of individuals in a population who have a specific disease or health condition at a...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies