Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Type-size variability for near-point acuity tests.

R T Jose, R M Atcherson

    American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics
    |September 1, 1977
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Enhancing decreased sight of patients with traumatic brain injury.

    NeuroRehabilitation·2014
    Same author

    Binocular contrast sensitivity testing for low vision patients.

    Journal of the American Optometric Association·1991
    Same author

    Behind the lens telescope: a new concept in bioptics.

    Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry·1989
    Same author

    William Policoff as an educator.

    American journal of optometry and physiological optics·1977
    Same author

    Applied genetics for the practicing optometrist. Part II.

    Journal of the American Optometric Association·1977
    Same author

    Applied genetics for the practicing optometrist.

    Journal of the American Optometric Association·1977
    Same journal

    Visual decrement with deposit accumulation of HEMA contact lenses.

    American journal of optometry and physiological optics·1988
    Same journal

    Stiles-Burch two-degree color mixture data.

    American journal of optometry and physiological optics·1988
    Same journal

    Undercorrection and myopia development.

    American journal of optometry and physiological optics·1988
    Same journal

    The International Optometric and Optical League.

    American journal of optometry and physiological optics·1988
    Same journal

    Quantitative photorefraction using an off-center flash source.

    American journal of optometry and physiological optics·1988
    Same journal

    An objective VER assessment of visual acuity compared with subjective measures.

    American journal of optometry and physiological optics·1988
    See all related articles

    Near-point acuity card specifications from manufacturers are unreliable for determining test letter sizes. The M notation system offers advantages for universal use in specifying near-point visual acuity.

    Area of Science:

    • Ophthalmology
    • Optometry
    • Vision Science

    Background:

    • Accurate measurement of visual acuity is crucial for diagnosing and managing vision disorders.
    • Near-point acuity cards are commonly used for testing vision at reading distances.
    • Discrepancies in manufacturer specifications can lead to inconsistent visual acuity assessments.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the accuracy of test form sizes on commercially available near-point acuity cards.
    • To compare different notation systems used for specifying near-point visual acuity.
    • To advocate for a standardized system for near-point visual acuity measurement.

    Main Methods:

    • Measured the physical sizes of test forms (letters, digits, symbols) on 19 near-point acuity cards.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Expressed all measurements using the M notation system (1 mm = 0.7 M).
  • Tabulated results according to manufacturer-specific notation systems (e.g., point-type, Jaeger, Snellen).

    • Main Results:

    • Manufacturer specifications on near-point acuity cards do not accurately reflect actual test letter sizes.
    • Significant variations exist between specified and measured sizes across different cards and systems.
    • The M notation provided a consistent and reliable measure of test form size.

    Conclusions:

    • Current manufacturer specifications for near-point acuity cards are inadequate for precise visual acuity determination.
    • The M notation system demonstrates superior advantages for specifying near-point visual acuity.
    • Universal adoption of the M notation system is recommended for standardization and improved clinical practice.