Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Allergic contact dermatitis: Sex differences.

J J Leyden, A M Kligman

    Contact Dermatitis
    |December 1, 1977
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Contact sensitization rates show minimal sex differences, with males at 9.9% and females at 9.2%. Previous observations of female predominance in sensitization are likely due to differing past exposure levels, not inherent sex-based susceptibility.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Assessment of the atrophogenicity of corticosteroids to human skin using non-invasive methods.

    Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI)·2016
    Same author

    The future of bioengineering A dermatologist's perspective.

    Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI)·2016
    Same author

    Mechanisms of eccrine anidrosis. I. High level blockade.

    The Journal of investigative dermatology·2015
    Same author

    The SLS provocative patch test in allergic contact sensitization.

    The Journal of investigative dermatology·2015
    Same author

    Corneobiology and corneotherapy--a final chapter.

    International journal of cosmetic science·2011
    Same author

    A new species of Cephalosporium in Madura foot (Cephalosporium granulomatis).

    Journal of bacteriology·2010

    Area of Science:

    • Dermatology and Immunology
    • Allergenicity and Sensitization Studies

    Background:

    • Previous research (Jordan & King, 1977) suggested females may be more susceptible to contact sensitization.
    • Maximization testing is a standard method for assessing chemical allergenicity.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate sex differences in sensitization rates across a broad range of test substances.
    • To determine if observed sex differences in sensitization are inherent or due to exposure variations.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of data from maximization testing involving 185 test substances.
    • Analysis of sensitization rates in male and female subjects for allergenic (73 substances) and non-allergenic compounds.

    Main Results:

    • Overall sensitization rates were similar: 9.9% for males and 9.2% for females.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • A slight female predominance in sensitization was observed only with the weakest allergens, predominantly fragrances.
  • In these specific cases, twice as many panels showed exclusively female reactors compared to exclusively male reactors.

    • Conclusions:

    • Observed sex differences in sensitization prevalence are attributed to variations in past exposure, not intrinsic sex-based susceptibility.
    • The study challenges previous notions of higher female susceptibility to contact sensitization.