Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Colloid and crystalloid fluid resuscitation.

J L Falk, E C Rackow, M H Weil

    Acute Care
    |January 1, 1983
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Choosing between colloid and crystalloid solutions for fluid resuscitation in critically ill patients is debated. Colloids offer faster plasma volume restoration, while crystalloids require larger volumes but may pose risks like pulmonary edema in older patients.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    The effect of zolpidem on operant behavior and its relation to pharmacokinetics after intravenous and subcutaneous administration: concentration-effect relations.

    Behavioural pharmacology·2002
    Same author

    Sublingual capnometry and indexes of tissue perfusion in patients with circulatory failure.

    Chest·2001
    Same author

    Monophosphoryl lipid A stimulated up-regulation of reactive oxygen intermediates in human monocytes in vitro.

    Journal of leukocyte biology·2001
    Same author

    Negligible tolerance produced by chronic intravenous alprazolam administration: a low serum drug concentration effect.

    Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology·2001
    Same author

    Spontaneous activity as a contingency-controlled behavior within an operant context: alprazolam concentration-effect relations after subcutaneous administration in rats.

    Psychopharmacology·2001
    Same author

    Two procedures establishing preference for oral cocaine and lidocaine solutions which do not use an associative history with a reinforcer.

    Behavioural pharmacology·2001
    Same journal

    Influence of age on the pharmacokinetics of butorphanol.

    Acute care·1988
    Same journal

    Outpatient sedation for oral surgery: a comparison of butorphanol and fentanyl.

    Acute care·1988
    Same journal

    Double-blind comparison of butorphanol and morphine in patient-controlled analgesia.

    Acute care·1988
    Same journal

    Patient-controlled analgesia using butorphanol for postoperative pain relief: an open-label study.

    Acute care·1988
    Same journal

    Urological applications of butorphanol tartrate: postoperative pain and renal colic.

    Acute care·1988
    Same journal

    Butorphanol tartrate: research advances in multiple clinical settings.

    Acute care·1988
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Critical Care Medicine
    • Emergency Medicine
    • Fluid Resuscitation Science

    Background:

    • The optimal fluid choice for resuscitation in critically ill patients remains a significant clinical controversy.
    • Crystalloid proponents emphasize extracellular water deficits in shock, advocating large volume replenishment.
    • Colloid advocates focus on hypovolemia as the primary shock defect, favoring rapid plasma volume restoration.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To compare the efficacy and retention of colloid versus crystalloid solutions in fluid resuscitation.
    • To analyze the impact of different fluid types on intravascular volume and patient outcomes.
    • To evaluate the risks associated with each fluid type, particularly in vulnerable patient populations.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of fluid dynamics and retention characteristics of crystalloid and colloid solutions.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of fluid resuscitation principles in shock management.
  • Comparison of volume requirements and intravascular retention times for different fluid types.

    • Main Results:

    • Colloidal fluids achieve prompt plasma volume restoration and hemodynamic stability with lower volumes.
    • Crystalloids require significantly larger volumes (2-4x) for comparable resuscitation.
    • Intravascular retention is significantly higher for colloids (nearly 100% after 1h) compared to crystalloids (8% water, <25% saline).
    • Hypertonic saline reduces intracellular fluid, while hyperoncotic colloid reduces interstitial and intracellular fluid, expanding intravascular volume.

    Conclusions:

    • The choice of fluid depends on rapid volume restoration, duration of effect, and adverse event profiles.
    • Crystalloid resuscitation carries a low risk in young trauma patients but increases pulmonary edema risk in older patients.
    • Colloids offer superior intravascular volume expansion and retention, crucial for effective hemodynamic support in shock.