Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The value of some suprathreshold auditory measures.

S D Stephens, B Blegvad, H J Krogh

    Scandinavian Audiology
    |January 1, 1977
    PubMed
    Summary

    This study compared loudness levels in audiology. The Most Comfortable Loudness Level showed the most variability, while Uncomfortable Loudness Level and Acoustic Reflex Threshold had similar variability.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Investigations on viseme groups in Welsh.

    Clinical linguistics & phonetics·2010
    Same author

    TEOAE-based estimation of the auditory threshold in the mid-octave frequencies.

    British journal of audiology·2000
    Same author

    Computed tomography evaluation of the inner ear as a diagnostic, counselling and management strategy in patients with congenital sensorineural hearing impairment.

    Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences·1999
    Same author

    An analysis of the communication tactics used by hearing-impaired adults.

    British journal of audiology·1999
    Same author

    The use of qualitative questionnaires in patients having and being considered for cochlear implants.

    Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences·1997
    Same author

    Storage stability of screwpress-extracted oils and residual meals from CELSS candidate oilseed crops.

    Advances in space research : the official journal of the Committee on Space Research (COSPAR)·1997

    Area of Science:

    • Audiology and Hearing Science
    • Psychoacoustics
    • Speech and Hearing Disorders

    Background:

    • Understanding loudness perception is crucial for audiological assessments.
    • Several factors, including acoustic and non-acoustic elements, influence key loudness measures.
    • Key measures include Most Comfortable Loudness Level (MCL), Uncomfortable Loudness Level (UCL), Acoustic Reflex Threshold (ART), and Threshold of Overload (TOL).

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To review factors affecting audiological loudness measures.
    • To experimentally compare MCL, UCL, ART, and TOL values.
    • To analyze absolute values and between- and within-subject variances for these measures.

    Main Methods:

    • A direct experimental comparison was conducted.
    • Evaluated absolute values of MCL, UCL, ART, and TOL.
    • Assessed between- and within-subject variability for each measure.

    Main Results:

    • The Most Comfortable Loudness Level (MCL) exhibited the highest within- and between-subject variability.
    • The Uncomfortable Loudness Level (UCL) demonstrated high between-subject variability.
    • UCL's within-subject variability was not significantly greater than the Acoustic Reflex Threshold (ART).

    Conclusions:

    • MCL is a highly variable measure, impacting its reliability in audiological testing.
    • UCL and ART show distinct variability patterns, important for clinical interpretation.
    • The findings have implications for the precise measurement and application of loudness levels in audiology.

    Related Experiment Videos