Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evaluation of cardiac murmurs.

E R Giuliani, R O Brandenburg, V Fuster

    Cardiovascular Clinics
    |January 1, 1980
    PubMed
    Summary

    This paper reviews how to evaluate heart murmurs in a clinical setting. It emphasizes that while the sound and location of a murmur can offer clues, a complete diagnosis requires combining patient history with a thorough physical exam. The authors suggest that using selective noninvasive tests can help avoid the need for more expensive and invasive procedures in most cases. The study highlights the importance of a structured diagnostic approach to ensure accurate and cost-effective evaluation of heart murmurs.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASES (OTHER THAN ATHEROSCLEROSIS)--COMMUNITY SERVICES.

    A listing of research in the cardiovascular field·2014
    Same author

    Observations on the specificity of the folic acid molecule.

    Southern medical journal·2010
    Same author

    Increased intraventricular velocities: an unrecognized cause of systolic murmur in adults.

    Journal of the American College of Cardiology·1998
    Same author

    Transient thrombotic state after abrupt discontinuation of heparin in percutaneous coronary angioplasty.

    American heart journal·1996
    Same author

    Angina pectoris and disease progression.

    Circulation·1995
    Same author

    Aspirin and other platelet-active drugs. The relationship among dose, effectiveness, and side effects.

    Chest·1995

    Area of Science:

    • Clinical cardiology diagnostics
    • Medical auscultation techniques
    • Noninvasive cardiovascular evaluation

    Background:

    Cardiac murmurs are common clinical findings that often require careful interpretation. Prior research has shown that the physical characteristics of murmurs can suggest possible underlying causes. However, no prior work had resolved how to integrate these observations with patient history and physical examination. Established knowledge includes the role of auscultation in identifying abnormal heart sounds. That uncertainty drove the need for a structured approach to evaluating murmurs in primary care. No prior work had clearly outlined how to prioritize diagnostic steps based on clinical findings. This gap motivated the authors to synthesize existing diagnostic strategies. It was already known that history and physical examination are essential components of diagnosis. Yet, no prior work had demonstrated how to combine these with selective noninvasive testing.

    Purpose Of The Study:

    The aim of this paper is to guide clinicians in evaluating cardiac murmurs effectively in an office setting. The specific problem is the challenge of distinguishing benign from pathological murmurs. The motivation is to reduce unnecessary invasive testing by using a systematic approach. The goal is to integrate clinical findings with diagnostic tests appropriately. The authors propose that combining history and physical examination can clarify most cases. They suggest that selective use of noninvasive tests can avoid costly procedures. The approach emphasizes cost-effective and efficient diagnostic workflows. The study seeks to provide a framework for decision-making in clinical practice.

    Keywords:
    cardiac murmur diagnosisnoninvasive heart testingcardiovascular examinationclinical auscultation

    Frequently Asked Questions

    The main outcome is that integrating patient history with physical examination clarifies murmur etiology in most cases.

    The authors propose that selective noninvasive tests can guide further evaluation and avoid unnecessary invasive studies.

    Patient history is important because it helps distinguish benign from pathological murmurs when combined with physical findings.

    Noninvasive tests are used selectively to confirm findings from history and physical examination before considering invasive studies.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Methods:

    The authors conducted a literature-based review of diagnostic strategies for cardiac murmurs. They focused on clinical evaluation in primary care settings. The approach included synthesizing findings from cardiovascular examination techniques. The methods involved analyzing how patient history influences murmur interpretation. They examined the role of auscultation in identifying murmur characteristics. The study also considered how to integrate physical findings with noninvasive tests. The authors reviewed diagnostic algorithms used in office-based cardiology. The methods emphasized the importance of selective testing to avoid unnecessary procedures.

    Main Results:

    The strongest finding is that combining patient history with physical examination clarifies murmur etiology in most cases. The authors report that selective use of noninvasive tests improves diagnostic accuracy. They found that invasive studies are needed only in specific clinical scenarios. The results suggest that auscultation alone is insufficient for definitive diagnosis. The study shows that diagnostic efficiency improves with structured clinical evaluation. The authors propose that a stepwise approach reduces the need for costly procedures. They observed that clinical judgment remains central to diagnostic decisions. The findings indicate that most murmurs can be evaluated without advanced imaging.

    Conclusions:

    The authors conclude that integrating patient history with physical examination is key to evaluating murmurs. They propose that selective noninvasive tests can guide further diagnostic steps. The study suggests that invasive procedures should be reserved for specific cases. The authors emphasize the importance of a structured diagnostic workflow. They state that clinical judgment remains essential in decision-making. The findings support the use of cost-effective strategies in cardiology. The authors suggest that most murmurs can be managed in primary care settings. They conclude that diagnostic accuracy improves with a systematic approach.

    A structured workflow improves diagnostic accuracy and reduces the need for costly and invasive procedures.

    The authors suggest that invasive studies should be reserved for cases where noninvasive findings are inconclusive.