Related Experiment Videos
Problems with the serum vitamin B12 assay
Lancet (London, England)
|November 15, 1980
Summary
Serum vitamin B12 tests are unreliable for diagnosing deficiency due to laboratory variations and poor correlation with actual deficiency. Alternative diagnostic markers are needed for accurate vitamin B12 status assessment.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Chemistry
- Hematology
- Nutritional Science
Background:
- Serum vitamin B12 estimations show significant inter-laboratory variability in routine practice.
- Current assays are often insensitive and non-specific for diagnosing vitamin B12 deficiency.
- The correlation between serum vitamin B12 levels and the clinical/biochemical consequences of deficiency is poor.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the limitations of serum vitamin B12 assays in diagnosing deficiency.
- To explore the role of vitamin B12 binding proteins in serum.
- To identify more reliable indicators of vitamin B12 status.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of quality control trial data for serum vitamin B12 assays.
- Review of existing literature on vitamin B12 metabolism and binding proteins.
- Comparison of serum vitamin B12 levels with clinical manifestations of deficiency.
Main Results:
- Serum vitamin B12 assays exhibit substantial variability, leading to diagnostic confusion.
- The majority of cobalamin in human serum is bound to transcobalamin I, a non-metabolically active protein.
- Deficiency of transcobalamin II can cause megaloblastic anemia despite normal serum vitamin B12 levels.
Conclusions:
- Serum vitamin B12 levels are an unreliable sole criterion for diagnosing vitamin B12 deficiency.
- The binding pattern of vitamin B12 in serum complicates accurate assessment.
- Transcobalamin II deficiency highlights the inadequacy of total serum cobalamin as a diagnostic marker.