Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

How safe is general practitioner obstetrics?

G W Taylor, W Edgar, B A Taylor

    Lancet (London, England)
    |December 13, 1980
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Motivation for participating in phase 1 vaccine trials: Comparison of an influenza and an Ebola randomized controlled trial.

    Vaccine·2018
    Same author

    Weight bias among exercise and nutrition professionals: a systematic review.

    Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity·2018
    Same author

    Upper airway outcomes following midface distraction osteogenesis: a systematic review.

    Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS·2014
    Same author

    Evaluation of SWI in children with sickle cell disease.

    AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2013
    Same author

    (Stereotactic) radiosurgery XIX: spinal radiosurgery--two year experience in a UK centre.

    British journal of neurosurgery·2011
    Same author

    Correlation between the temperature dependence of intrinsic MR parameters and thermal dose measured by a rapid chemical shift imaging technique.

    NMR in biomedicine·2011

    Booking low-risk women with general practitioners is as safe as consultant care. This study found no reduction in perinatal mortality for women transferred to consultant units, suggesting improved collaboration enhances safety.

    Area of Science:

    • Obstetrics and Gynecology
    • Maternal-Fetal Medicine
    • Public Health

    Background:

    • High perinatal mortality rates are observed in infants born to women transferred from general practitioner (GP) to consultant care.
    • This has led to the implication that earlier booking for consultant care might prevent some infant deaths.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate whether booking into a consultant maternity unit reduces perinatal mortality compared to general practitioner maternity units for low-risk pregnancies.

    Main Methods:

    • The study compared perinatal mortality rates between women booked into consultant units versus general practitioner units.
    • Analysis focused on the impact of transfer of care from GP to consultant services.

    Main Results:

    Related Experiment Videos

    • Booking into a consultant unit did not significantly reduce perinatal mortality.
    • For low-risk women, booking into a GP maternity unit demonstrated comparable safety to consultant units when hospital-GP liaison and transfer processes are effective.

    Conclusions:

    • The findings challenge the assumption that consultant booking is inherently safer for all women.
    • Effective communication and seamless transfer between general practitioners and hospitals are crucial for ensuring the safety of low-risk pregnancies in GP maternity units.