Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Query cardiac pain.

J W Todd

    Lancet (London, England)
    |August 6, 1983
    PubMed
    Summary

    Interpreting cardiac pain relies heavily on patient history, as diagnostic tests like ECGs and coronary arteriography have limitations. Misdiagnosis of cardiac conditions is common, with overreliance on technology hindering accurate patient assessment.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Field Response of New Peanut Cultivar UF 91108 to Tomato Spotted Wilt Virus.

    Plant disease·2019
    Same author

    Differentiation of Biologically Distinct Peanut Stripe Potyvirus Strains by a Nucleotide Polymorphism-Based Assay.

    Plant disease·2019
    Same author

    Molecular Diagnosis of Tomato Spotted Wilt Tospovirus Infection of Peanut and Other Field and Greenhouse Crops.

    Plant disease·2019
    Same author

    First Report of Natural Infection of Peanut (Groundnut) by Impatiens Necrotic Spot Tospovirus (Family Bunyaviridae).

    Plant disease·2019
    Same author

    Differential Response of Selected Peanut (Arachis hypogaea) Genotypes to Mechanical Inoculation by Tomato spotted wilt virus.

    Plant disease·2019
    Same author

    Field Evaluations of Leaf Spot Resistance and Yield in Peanut Genotypes in the United States and Bolivia.

    Plant disease·2019

    Area of Science:

    • Cardiology
    • Diagnostic Medicine

    Background:

    • Cardiac pain is a prevalent issue with significant diagnostic challenges.
    • Historical diagnostic methods, including electrocardiograms (ECGs), have proven unreliable for definitively excluding cardiac infarcts.
    • Current diagnostic approaches in cardiology are often hampered by an overemphasis on technology.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To critically evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of various methods for interpreting cardiac pain.
    • To highlight the limitations of current technological diagnostic tools in cardiology.
    • To emphasize the importance of patient history in diagnosing cardiac conditions.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of historical and current diagnostic practices in cardiology.
    • Analysis of the utility and limitations of ECGs and coronary arteriography.
    • Emphasis on the role of clinical history-taking in patient assessment.

    Main Results:

    • No diagnostic test can definitively prove the absence of a cardiac infarct.
    • Patient history remains the most crucial tool for interpreting recurrent cardiac pain.
    • Coronary arteriography is valuable only when myocardial ischemia is certain but its cause is unclear.
    • Many cases of cardiac pain go undiagnosed, which may not be detrimental and can even benefit patients with minor infarcts.

    Conclusions:

    • The history of cardiology is marked by diagnostic errors, including the overdiagnosis of "bogus" cardiac diseases.
    • Overreliance on technology in modern cardiology leads to diagnostic oversights.
    • A comprehensive patient history is paramount for accurate diagnosis and management of cardiac pain.

    Related Experiment Videos