Related Experiment Videos
Bone-marrow transplantation for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia
Lancet (London, England)
|September 17, 1983
Summary
Bone-marrow transplants offer long-term disease-free survival for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) patients. Survival rates are higher when transplants occur in first remission versus second, though relapse rates remain similar.
Area of Science:
- Hematology
- Oncology
- Transplantation Immunology
Background:
- Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) remains a significant challenge, necessitating effective treatment strategies.
- Bone-marrow transplantation (BMT) is a potential curative option for ALL.
- Optimizing BMT protocols, including timing and patient risk stratification, is crucial for improving outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the long-term survival and relapse rates of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) patients undergoing HLA-identical sibling bone-marrow transplantation.
- To compare outcomes based on disease remission status (first vs. second remission) and risk stratification (standard vs. high-risk).
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 106 patients with ALL in first or second remission and 98 patients with advanced disease.
- Actuarial survival and relapse rates were calculated at 4 years post-transplant.
- Comparison of outcomes between patients transplanted in first vs. second remission, and between standard-risk and high-risk groups.
Main Results:
- Four-year actuarial survival was 43% in patients transplanted in first/second remission and 15% in advanced disease patients.
- Relapse rates were 32% in first/second remission and 67% in advanced disease.
- High-risk patients transplanted in first remission showed higher survival (55%) than those in second remission (41%), with comparable relapse rates.
Conclusions:
- Long-term disease-free survival is achievable in ALL patients through bone-marrow transplantation.
- Transplantation in first remission may offer survival advantages, although further research is needed to confirm this.
- Relapse rates were similar between first and second remission transplants, highlighting the need for continued risk stratification and treatment optimization.