Related Experiment Videos
A discriminant-function analysis of screening tests for excessive drinking and alcoholism
Journal of Studies on Alcohol
|January 1, 1984
Summary
Rapid interviews and glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) testing effectively screen for excessive drinking and alcoholism. Combining the Reich interview with GDH testing achieved 100% sensitivity for detecting these conditions.
Area of Science:
- Psychiatry
- Clinical Chemistry
- Medical Diagnostics
Background:
- Previous studies indicated rapid interviews outperform laboratory tests for screening excessive drinking.
- The efficacy of screening methods for alcoholism requires further investigation, particularly regarding information overlap and cut-off points.
Purpose of the Study:
- To re-examine the separation of patients with excessive drinking patterns from normal drinkers using discriminant analysis.
- To identify the most effective screening methods for excessive drinking and alcoholism.
- To evaluate the impact of laboratory test cut-off points on screening sensitivity.
Main Methods:
- Discriminant analysis was employed to re-evaluate screening performance.
- Comparison of three rapid interviews (including Brief Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test and Reich interview) against nine laboratory tests.
- Assessment of glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH), gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, and mean corpuscular volume performance.
Main Results:
- Discriminant analysis confirmed the high performance of rapid interviews, specifically the Reich interview.
- Glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) emerged as the best-performing laboratory test, comparable in efficacy to rapid interviews for excessive drinkers.
- The combination of the Reich interview and GDH demonstrated 100% sensitivity for excessive drinking and alcoholism without compromising specificity.
Conclusions:
- Rapid interviews and GDH testing are highly effective for screening excessive drinking and alcoholism.
- The optimal screening strategy involves combining the Reich interview with GDH testing for maximum sensitivity and specificity.
- Arbitrary cut-off points for laboratory tests do not improve screening performance compared to using the full range of results.