[The so-called partial synchronization in the treatment of malignant lymphomas. A clinical study]

In a randomized study the effectiveness of a modified MOPP scheme (CVPP scheme) and a so-called partial synchronisation treatment (vincristine or vinblastine respectively and cyclophosphamide) was compared in 72 patients predominantly pretreated with Hodgkin lymphomas and non-Hodgkin lymphomas. From 49 patients affected with lymphogranulomatosis of stage IIIB and IV, 24 were treated according to CVPP scheme; in 10 of them a complete remission was achieved and in 4 of them a partial remission. 25 patients were treated in the control group with synchronization therapy. In 13 of them a complete remission and in 12 of them a partial remission was achieved. With CVPP therapy the mean remission time amounted to 14.4 months and with synchronization therapy 9.2 months. There was no significant statistical difference. From 23 patients with advanced non-Hodgkin lymphomas of a high malignancy 11 received a therapy with CVPP scheme; 2 of them came into a complete remission and 3 of them into a partial one. 12 patients received a synchronization therapy; 7 of them came into a partial remission. With CVPP therapy the mean remission time amounted to 14.4 months, with partial synchronization therapy--10.8 months. Even in non-Hodgkin lymphomas there was no significant difference between the forms of therapy used. Even a comparison of the two survival times of both forms of treatment does not reveal any significance. Thus, both procedures of treatment seem to be comparable in their therapeutic efficaciousness, even if the number of complete remissions during the treatment with CVPP scheme was greater in our investigations. The assumed lower toxicity of synchronization therapy could not be confirmed by our study. In addition to the controversial synchronization effect, the good efficaciousness of treatment according to the so-called synchronization therapy may be due to sensibilizing phenomena and recruitment phenomena.