Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials and retinal eccentricity.

J T Meredith, G G Celesia

    Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology
    |March 1, 1982
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Recent advances in clinical neurophysiology of vision.

    Supplements to Clinical neurophysiology·2003
    Same author

    Nervous system channelopathies.

    Supplements to Clinical neurophysiology·2003
    Same author

    Persistent vegetative state: clinical and ethical issues.

    Supplements to Clinical neurophysiology·2003
    Same author

    Disorders of membrane channels or channelopathies.

    Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology·2001
    Same author

    Decreased prevalence of Alzheimer disease associated with 3-hydroxy-3-methyglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors.

    Archives of neurology·2000
    Same author

    Cortical visual processing.

    Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement·2000
    Same journal

    Coming to terms with brain waves.

    Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology·2014
    Same journal

    Habituation of lower leg stretch responses in Parkinson's disease.

    Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology·2000
    Same journal

    Asymmetry of cortical excitability revealed by transcranial stimulation in a patient with focal motor epilepsy and cortical myoclonus.

    Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology·2000
    Same journal

    Evoked isometric muscle contractions in myopathies: analysis of pathophysiological properties by different stimulus patterns.

    Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology·2000
    Same journal

    Task-related coherence and task-related spectral power changes during sequential finger movements.

    Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology·2000
    Same journal

    Electrophysiological studies in mild idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome.

    Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology·2000
    See all related articles

    Visual evoked potentials (VEP) amplitude is highest at the retinal fixation point. VEP response decreases with eccentricity but can be elicited with larger stimuli, indicating retinal area influences visual processing.

    Area of Science:

    • Neuroscience
    • Ophthalmology
    • Visual Science

    Background:

    • Visual evoked potentials (VEP) are crucial for assessing visual pathway function.
    • Understanding how retinal stimulation affects VEPs is key to diagnosing visual processing disorders.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate the impact of stimulating discrete retinal areas on VEP amplitude.
    • To determine the relationship between stimulus size, retinal eccentricity, and VEP response.

    Main Methods:

    • 16 healthy volunteers underwent VEP testing.
    • Stimuli were 2°18' fields with reversing checks (34'30') at 500ms intervals.
    • VEPs were recorded for stimuli at varying retinal eccentricities and sizes.

    Main Results:

    Related Experiment Videos

    • VEP amplitude peaked at the fixation point, decreasing significantly within the 2-4 degree isopters.
    • No response was detected outside the 4-6 degree isopters with the initial stimulus size.
    • Larger stimulus fields and equivalent visual cortex activation at different eccentricities yielded similar VEP amplitudes.

    Conclusions:

    • Retinal eccentricity and stimulus size are critical factors influencing VEP amplitude.
    • VEP responses are most robust in the central visual field.
    • The visual cortex may process visual information from different retinal eccentricities similarly when cortical area is normalized.