Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Lifting capacity of workers.

M M Ayoub

    Journal of Human Ergology
    |December 1, 1977
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Determining safe lifting guidelines requires understanding psychophysical, physiological, and biomechanical methods. This study reviews these approaches and highlights data conflicts for industrial workers.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Dynamic patterns of expressed genes in granulosa cells during follicular and luteal stages in Egyptian buffaloes.

    Tropical animal health and production·2021
    Same author

    A biomechanical evaluation of lifting speed using work- and moment-related measures.

    Ergonomics·1999
    Same author

    Bilateral recurrent nerve paralysis associated with multinodular substernal goiter: a case report.

    The American surgeon·1999
    Same author

    The psychophysical approach to manual materials handling task design.

    Ergonomics·1999
    Same author

    Evaluation of the ability of power to predict low frequency lifting capacity.

    Ergonomics·1998
    Same author

    Ergonomic investigation of letter-carrier satchels: part I. Field study.

    Applied ergonomics·1996
    Same journal

    DETERMINATION OF THE OPTIMAL DURATION OF WORK EXPOSURE WHILE SITTING IN A SQUATTING POSITION TO AVOID LOW BACK PAIN: A SIMULATION STUDY.

    Journal of human ergology·2018
    Same journal

    COMFORT FROM HEARING PROTECTORS.

    Journal of human ergology·2018
    Same journal

    STRIAING FOR MUDERNILED BALINESE MEITICS (GEGULAA).

    Journal of human ergology·2018
    Same journal

    SEX DIFFERENCES IN THE EFFECTS OF DIVERSE SOUNDS ON HEART RATE VARIABILITY.

    Journal of human ergology·2016
    Same journal

    PULMONARY FUNCTION STUDIES IN FEMALE SINGERS OF KOLKATA, INDIA.

    Journal of human ergology·2016
    Same journal

    PHYSIOLOGICAL STRAIN AMONG WOMEN POTATO CULTIVATORS IN WEST BENGAL, INDIA.

    Journal of human ergology·2016
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Occupational health and safety
    • Ergonomics
    • Biomechanics

    Background:

    • Establishing valid lifting guidelines necessitates accurate determination of lifting capacity.
    • Current methods include psychophysical, physiological, and biomechanical approaches.
    • Data from these methods provide insights into lifting capacity but can present conflicts.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To discuss the three primary methodologies for assessing lifting capacity: psychophysical, physiological, and biomechanical.
    • To present data on lifting capacity, particularly for males and females in the industrial workforce.
    • To identify and discuss the conflicts observed within the data derived from these different approaches.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of psychophysical methods assessing subjective exertion during lifting tasks.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of physiological measures, such as heart rate and oxygen consumption, during lifting.
  • Examination of biomechanical models and analyses of forces and torques during lifting.

    • Main Results:

    • Each methodology provides valuable, yet sometimes conflicting, data regarding human lifting capacity.
    • Data indicate variations in lifting capacity between males and females within the industrial workforce.
    • Conflicts arise from differing assumptions and outcome measures across the psychophysical, physiological, and biomechanical approaches.

    Conclusions:

    • A comprehensive understanding of lifting capacity requires integrating data from multiple methodologies.
    • Further research is needed to resolve data conflicts and refine lifting guidelines for diverse industrial populations.
    • Addressing these conflicts is crucial for developing effective and evidence-based occupational lifting recommendations.