Related Experiment Videos
Hetastarch as a prime for cardiopulmonary bypass
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
|December 1, 1982
Summary
Hetastarch prime for cardiopulmonary bypass resulted in lower postoperative platelet counts compared to albumin. However, hetastarch offered significant cost savings without affecting other clinical outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Anesthesiology
- Hematology
Background:
- Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) requires effective plasma volume expanders.
- Albumin and hetastarch are commonly used colloid osmotic agents.
- Evaluating the impact of different prime solutions on perioperative outcomes is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effects of hetastarch versus albumin prime on perioperative laboratory values and outcomes in myocardial revascularization.
- To assess the cost-effectiveness of hetastarch as a CPB prime solution.
Main Methods:
- A prospective study involving 37 patients undergoing myocardial revascularization with hetastarch prime.
- Comparison with a historical cohort of 42 patients who received albumin-containing prime.
- Analysis of postoperative laboratory values including platelet counts, hemoglobin, fibrinogen, and coagulation times.
- Evaluation of chest tube drainage and blood usage.
Main Results:
- Patients receiving hetastarch prime exhibited significantly lower postoperative platelet counts (p < 0.02).
- No significant differences were observed in chest tube drainage, blood transfusion requirements, plasma hemoglobin, fibrinogen levels, or coagulation times between the groups.
- Hetastarch prime demonstrated substantial cost savings ($119.50/patient) compared to albumin prime ($321.35/patient).
Conclusions:
- Hetastarch can be used as a prime for CPB in myocardial revascularization.
- While hetastarch may lead to reduced platelet counts, it does not appear to compromise other critical perioperative hemostatic or clinical outcomes.
- The use of hetastarch offers a significant cost advantage over albumin in CPB procedures.