Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Principles for identifying structural differences. Some methodological issues related to comparative factor analysis.

W R Cunningham

    Journal of Gerontology
    |January 1, 1978
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Evidence for the Collective Nature of Radial Flow in Pb+Pb Collisions with the ATLAS Detector.

    Physical review letters·2026
    Same author

    Evidence for the Dimuon Decay of the Higgs Boson in pp Collisions with the ATLAS Detector.

    Physical review letters·2025
    Same author

    Evidence for Longitudinally Polarized W Bosons in the Electroweak Production of Same-Sign W Boson Pairs in Association with Two Jets in pp Collisions at sqrt[s]=13  TeV with the ATLAS Detector.

    Physical review letters·2025
    Same author

    Observation of tt[over ¯] Production in Pb+Pb Collisions at sqrt[s_{NN}]=5.02  TeV with the ATLAS Detector.

    Physical review letters·2025
    Same author

    Search for Dark Matter Produced in Association with a Dark Higgs Boson in the bb[over ¯] Final State Using pp Collisions at sqrt[s]=13  TeV with the ATLAS Detector.

    Physical review letters·2025
    Same author

    Search for Magnetic Monopole Pair Production in Ultraperipheral Pb+Pb Collisions at sqrt[s_{NN}]=5.36  TeV with the ATLAS Detector at the LHC.

    Physical review letters·2025
    Same journal

    Shakespeare's attitude towards old age.

    Journal of gerontology·2010
    Same journal

    Involution of tissues in fetal life; a review.

    Journal of gerontology·2010
    Same journal

    Attitudes toward aging and the aged; primitive societies.

    Journal of gerontology·2010
    Same journal

    Budgeting for social security.

    Journal of gerontology·2010
    Same journal

    The Hodson Community Center; an experiment in preservation of personality.

    Journal of gerontology·2010
    Same journal

    Prolongation of life with prevention of leukemia by thymectomy in mice.

    Journal of gerontology·2010
    See all related articles

    This review highlights four key principles for comparing factor structures in psychological and medical fitness research. Adhering to these principles ensures accurate, reproducible findings in gerontology studies.

    Area of Science:

    • Gerontology
    • Psychology
    • Medical Fitness

    Background:

    • Recent studies in the Journal of Gerontology examine changes in factor structure for psychological, social, and medical fitness measures.
    • Comparing these structures across studies presents methodological challenges.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To review four core principles for comparing factor structures.
    • To evaluate recent gerontology articles based on these principles.

    Main Methods:

    • The review focuses on four principles: metric issues, rotation to similarity, determining the number of factors, and consistent extraction/rotation procedures.
    • Articles are evaluated based on their adherence to these comparative principles.

    Main Results:

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Using different metrics can create artificial differences in factor structures.
  • Failure to rotate to similarity or properly address the number of factors can lead to misleadingly dissimilar structures.
  • Variations in extraction or rotation methods across studies can produce artifactual differences in results.

    • Conclusions:

    • Consistent application of these four principles is crucial for accurate comparison of factor structures in gerontology research.
    • Methodological rigor in comparing psychological, social, and medical fitness measures is essential for valid scientific conclusions.