Related Experiment Videos
Variance in the activity of the fourth component of mouse complement
The Tohoku Journal of Experimental Medicine
|October 1, 1983
Summary
Two hemolytic titration methods for complement component 4 (C4) yield different results based on whether C4 is in plasma or serum. This is due to distinct molecular states of C4 in serum affecting assay outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Immunology
- Biochemistry
Background:
- Complement component 4 (C4) plays a crucial role in the immune system.
- Hemolytic titration is a standard method for quantifying C4 activity.
- Existing titration methods may be influenced by the sample matrix (plasma vs. serum).
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare two hemolytic titration methods for C4 (E-C and C4D methods).
- To investigate the influence of C4 molecular states in plasma and serum on assay results.
- To elucidate the role of mouse C5 in C4 hemolytic assays.
Main Methods:
- Hemolytic titration using E-C method (EAClgp, oxyC2hu, EDTA-Cgp) and C4D method (EAClgp, oxyC2hu, C4Dgp).
- Chromatographic analysis to characterize C4 molecular states in serum.
- Assay of C4 activity in plasma and serum samples from Ssh strain mice.
Main Results:
- C4 titers differed between the E-C and C4D methods depending on whether C4 was in plasma or serum.
- Serum C4 activity was higher with the E-C method, while plasma C4 activity was lower compared to the C4D method for Ssh strain.
- Chromatographic analysis revealed at least four distinct C4 molecular states in serum with varying Ss antigenicity and hemolytic activity.
Conclusions:
- The observed differences in C4 titration are attributed to the distinct molecular states of C4 present in serum versus plasma.
- Different C4 molecular forms interact uniquely with the E-C and C4D assay components.
- The study highlights the importance of considering C4 molecular heterogeneity in hemolytic assays and discusses the role of mouse C5.