Neural vasodilator control in the rectum of the cat and its possible mediation by vasoactive intestinal polypeptide

Vascular and motor responses in the rectum to pelvic nerve stimulation are described in the anaesthetized cat and compared with corresponding effects observed in the colon. The responses comprise a cholinergic and a non-cholinergic component, and an attempt has been made to elucidate the latter. Pelvic nerve stimulation evoked a pronounced and well maintained vasodilator response in the rectum whereas that in the colon was transient. Maximal vasodilatation occurred at much lower stimulus frequencies in the rectum (2-4 Hz) than it did in the colon (8-16 Hz) and maximal blood flow under these conditions was also greater in the rectum (greater than 200 ml 100 g-1 min-1) than the colon (less than 150 ml 100 g-1 min-1). Muscarinic blockade further curtailed the colonic vasodilator response to pelvic nerve stimulation, whereas the rectal dilatation was only slightly reduced in the presence of atropine. Pelvic nerve stimulation caused a substantial release of vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) from the rectum, which was related both in magnitude and duration to the vasodilatation. Intra-arterial infusions of VIP, which reproduced this rise in rectal venous VIP concentration, caused a rectal vasodilator response which closely resembled that during pelvic nerve stimulation after cholinergic blockade. The rectal vasculature was estimated to be 50-100 times more sensitive to VIP than the colonic vasculature. VIP therefore seems to be the most likely putative neurotransmitter responsible for non-cholinergic rectal vasodilatation. Stimulation of the pelvic nerves also caused rapid contractile motor responses before, and more gradual motor responses after, muscarinic blockade in both the colon and rectum, in the latter preceded by a non-cholinergic relaxation. These patterns of motor activity largely confirm previous results. Infusions of substance P effectively mimicked the non-cholinergic contractile motor responses but failed to demonstrate significant release of this peptide during pelvic nerve stimulation in the present experiments. However, substance P is rapidly inactivated and might possibly be involved in these responses. Stimulation of the pelvic nerves in bursts at high frequencies (up to 80 Hz), simulating a discharge pattern observed electrophysiologically in vivo, was effective in eliciting all the above responses, with the exception of the colonic contraction.