Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Apparent pacemaker failure due to reversion circuitry within the programming device.

D L Hayes, D R Holmes, J Merideth

    Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology : PACE
    |March 1, 1984
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Effect of cardiac resynchronisation therapy on occurrence of ventricular arrhythmia in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators undergoing upgrade to cardiac resynchronisation therapy devices.

    Heart (British Cardiac Society)·2007
    Same author

    Non-paroxysmal junctional tachycardia with type I exit block.

    Heart (British Cardiac Society)·2002
    Same author

    Triboelectric simulation of pacemaker malfunction.

    Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology·2002
    Same author

    Radiofrequency treatment of hepatic neoplasms in patients with permanent pacemakers.

    Mayo Clinic proceedings·2001
    Same author

    Breath-holding spells associated with significant bradycardia: successful treatment with permanent pacemaker implantation.

    Pediatrics·2001
    Same author

    Left ventricular and biventricular pacing in congestive heart failure.

    Mayo Clinic proceedings·2001

    Pacemaker reprogramming failed due to undocumented reversion circuitry. This highlights the need for detailed pacemaker information and clinician familiarity with device specifics.

    Area of Science:

    • Cardiology
    • Biomedical Engineering

    Background:

    • Patients with permanent pacemakers require periodic evaluation for arrhythmias.
    • Reprogramming pacemaker modes (e.g., DVI, VVI, DDD) is a standard procedure for rhythm assessment.

    Observation:

    • A patient's pacemaker could not be reprogrammed from VVI mode to DVI or DDD.
    • Multiple attempts with different programmers were unsuccessful, suggesting a device malfunction.

    Findings:

    • The reprogramming failure was attributed to an undocumented 'reversion circuitry' within the pacemaker.
    • A special programming sequence, not detailed in the literature, was required to overcome this issue.

    Implications:

    • This case underscores the critical need for comprehensive documentation of pacemaker features by manufacturers.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Clinicians must possess in-depth knowledge of specific pacemaker models to avoid procedural complications.
  • Enhanced device familiarity can prevent unnecessary invasive procedures like pacemaker explantation.