Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Radical retroperitoneal surgery: a 25-year experience.

W R Pitts, V F Marshall

    The Journal of Urology
    |January 1, 1978
    PubMed
    Summary

    Radical retroperitoneal excisions are safe. The flank thoracoabdominal approach offers reduced morbidity and better exposure for renal procedures, with pleural drainage minimizing pulmonary complications.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Urolithiasis in children.

    Urology·2011
    Same author

    Repair of vesicovaginal fistula caused by radiation.

    Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics·2010
    Same author

    The treatment of penetrating wounds of the brain produced by missiles of warfare.

    The Southern surgeon·2010
    Same author

    Observations on urinary dysfunction after excision of the rectum.

    The Journal of urology·2010
    Same author

    A comparison of radiation and surgery for cancer of the bladder.

    Journal of the American Medical Association·2010
    Same author

    Transplantation of the ureters and total cystectomy.

    The Journal of urology·2010

    Area of Science:

    • Surgical Oncology
    • Abdominal Surgery
    • Urologic Oncology

    Background:

    • Radical retroperitoneal excision is a complex surgical procedure.
    • Assessing the safety and efficacy of different surgical approaches is crucial for patient outcomes.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the safety and comparative outcomes of abdominal versus flank thoracoabdominal incisions for radical retroperitoneal excisions.
    • To identify factors influencing surgical morbidity and exposure.

    Main Methods:

    • Retrospective review of 210 radical retroperitoneal excisions.
    • Comparison of outcomes between abdominal and flank thoracoabdominal approaches.
    • Analysis of complication rates, particularly pulmonary complications.

    Main Results:

    • Both abdominal and flank thoracoabdominal incisions were found to be relatively safe.
    • The flank approach demonstrated lower morbidity and superior exposure of the renal hilus and suprarenal regions.
    • Utilizing indwelling pleural drainage tubes significantly reduced pulmonary complications in the flank thoracoabdominal group.

    Conclusions:

    • The flank thoracoabdominal approach is a safe and effective option for radical retroperitoneal excision.
    • This approach is particularly advantageous when extensive bilateral renal exposure is not required.
    • Minimizing pulmonary complications through pleural drainage enhances the safety profile of the flank thoracoabdominal incision.

    Related Experiment Videos