Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Schematic information, attention, and memory for places.

P Salmaso, M R Baroni, R Job

    Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition
    |April 1, 1983
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Dissociating the role of dACC and dlPFC for emotion appraisal and mood regulation using cathodal tDCS.

    Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience·2021
    Same author

    [Serotype distribution of Streptococcus pneumoniae isolated from invasive infections at the Hospital de Niños of Santa Fe].

    Revista Argentina de microbiologia·2008
    Same author

    The picture-word interference effect is not a Stroop effect.

    Psychonomic bulletin & review·2007
    Same author

    Semantic and repetition priming within the attentional blink: an event-related brain potential (ERP) investigation study.

    Biological psychology·2007
    Same author

    Evaluation of a nested-PCR assay for Streptococcus pneumoniae detection in pediatric patients with community-acquired pneumonia.

    Revista Argentina de microbiologia·2006
    Same author

    [Necrotizing lymphadenitis caused by Nocardia asteroides in a healthy girl].

    Revista Argentina de microbiologia·2004
    Same journal

    Testing the predictions of a distinctiveness model of memory: The production effect in backward recall.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
    Same journal

    On the impact of adjacency on transposed-word effects under serial presentation.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
    Same journal

    It's time to opt out: Metacognitive analysis of time regulation under uncertainty.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
    Same journal

    The role of statistical learning in attentional guidance during search through naturalistic scenes.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
    Same journal

    Representing objects and features in long-term memory: A case for direct feature-feature binding.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
    Same journal

    Crossmodal correspondences influence adaptation during rule-based category learning of objects.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
    See all related articles

    People remember structural place details better incidentally, but variable details when expecting a memory test. This highlights how intentional coding impacts recall and recognition of environmental information.

    Area of Science:

    • Cognitive Psychology
    • Environmental Psychology

    Background:

    • Memory recall and recognition are influenced by encoding conditions.
    • Understanding how environmental features are processed is crucial for cognitive science.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate how incidental versus intentional learning affects memory for different types of environmental features.
    • To explore the role of intentionally governed coding in spatial memory.

    Main Methods:

    • Participants were exposed to three distinct locations under two conditions: incidental and intentional memory tasks.
    • Memory recall and recognition for structural (e.g., walls) and variable (e.g., furniture) features were assessed.

    Main Results:

    • Incidental learning led to better recall of structural features compared to variable features.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Intentional learning resulted in superior memory for variable features over structural ones.
  • Data suggests a differential encoding strategy based on memory expectation.

    • Conclusions:

    • Memory encoding strategies adapt based on whether memory is expected.
    • Intentionally governed coding plays a significant role in prioritizing and retaining specific environmental details.