Related Experiment Videos
Summary
State supplementary payments for the aged, blind, and disabled saw a 3% decline in recipients between 1979 and 1981. Despite fewer individuals receiving Supplemental Security Income (SSI), program expenditures continued to rise.
Area of Science:
- Social Gerontology
- Public Health Policy
- Disability Studies
Background:
- The Supplemental Security Income (SSI) program provides financial assistance to aged, blind, and disabled individuals.
- State supplementation is an additional payment provided by states to certain SSI recipients.
- Understanding trends in SSI caseloads and expenditures is crucial for policy evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze changes in the number of recipients of State supplementary payments under the SSI program.
- To examine shifts in the distribution of recipients across eligibility categories (age, blindness, disability).
- To compare trends in recipient numbers with trends in State supplementary payment expenditures.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of administrative data on recipients of State supplementary payments from December 1979 to December 1981.
- Comparison of recipient numbers and eligibility categories over the specified period.
- Examination of expenditure data for State supplementary payments during the same timeframe.
Main Results:
- The total number of recipients for State supplementary payments decreased by 3% (67,000 individuals) between 1979 and 1981.
- This decline mirrored a 3% reduction in Federal SSI payments during the same period.
- Eligibility category shifts included a 9% decrease in age-eligible recipients, a 1% increase in blindness-eligible recipients, and a 1% increase in disability-eligible recipients.
- Despite the decrease in recipients, expenditures for State supplementary payments continued to increase.
Conclusions:
- The SSI program experienced a modest decline in recipients for State supplementary payments, with notable shifts in eligibility demographics.
- The increase in expenditures despite a decrease in caseload suggests rising costs per recipient or changes in payment structures.
- Further research is needed to understand the factors driving these trends and their implications for program sustainability.