Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparison of the structures of cro and lambda repressor proteins from bacteriophage lambda.

D H Ohlendorf, W F Anderson, M Lewis

    Journal of Molecular Biology
    |September 25, 1983
    PubMed
    Summary

    Structural comparison of bacteriophage lambda cro repressor and lambda repressor amino-terminal domains reveals conserved alpha-helices critical for DNA binding. Differences in N-terminal regions explain variations in protein-DNA interactions.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    The role of calcium ions in the stability and instability of a thermolysin-like protease.

    Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society·2011
    Same author

    Rearrangement of side-chains in a Zif268 mutant highlights the complexities of zinc finger-DNA recognition.

    Journal of molecular biology·2002
    Same author

    A structural view of the action of Escherichia coli (lacZ) beta-galactosidase.

    Biochemistry·2001
    Same author

    Competing protein:protein interactions are proposed to control the biological switch of the E coli biotin repressor.

    Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society·2001
    Same author

    Beyond the "recognition code": structures of two Cys2His2 zinc finger/TATA box complexes.

    Structure (London, England : 1993)·2001
    Same author

    The conformation of the epsilon- and gamma-subunits within the Escherichia coli F(1) ATPase.

    The Journal of biological chemistry·2001

    Area of Science:

    • Structural biology
    • Molecular genetics
    • Bacteriophage biology

    Background:

    • Bacteriophage lambda cro repressor and lambda repressor proteins regulate viral gene expression.
    • These proteins share sequence homology, suggesting conserved structural and functional domains.
    • Understanding their three-dimensional structures is key to deciphering their DNA-binding mechanisms.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To compare the three-dimensional structures of cro repressor and the amino-terminal domain of lambda repressor.
    • To elucidate the structural basis for sequence homology and functional similarities/differences in DNA binding.
    • To investigate how structural variations influence protein-DNA interactions.

    Main Methods:

    • Three-dimensional structure determination (likely X-ray crystallography or NMR spectroscopy).

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparative structural analysis of cro repressor and lambda repressor amino-terminal domain.
  • Analysis of sequence homology in relation to structural conservation.

    • Main Results:

    • The second and third alpha-helices (α2 and α3) exhibit nearly identical conformations in both proteins.
    • Structural correspondence is noted in parts of the first alpha-helices (α1), suggesting revised N-terminal homology.
    • A loop present in lambda repressor between α1 and α2 is absent in cro repressor, impacting DNA binding specificity.

    Conclusions:

    • The conserved α2-α3 helical units are likely responsible for similar DNA binding modes in both proteins.
    • Structural differences, particularly the N-terminal loop, explain variations in how cro and lambda repressors interact with DNA.
    • Stereochemical constraints limit the precise alignment of these helical units on DNA, leading to distinct binding patterns.