Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Closed-circuit and high-flow systems: examining alternatives.

E A Ernst, J A Spain

    Contemporary Anesthesia Practice
    |January 1, 1984
    PubMed
    Summary

    Nonrebreathing anesthesia systems offer patient safety but have drawbacks like pollution and inability to measure uptake. Closed-circuit anesthesia promises better monitoring and efficiency for patient care.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    [Not Available].

    Journal of the Illinois State Historical Society. Illinois State Historical Society·2011
    Same author

    Direct atomic force microscope imaging of EcoRI endonuclease site specifically bound to plasmid DNA molecules.

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·1996
    Same author

    Automatic control of anesthetic delivery and ventilation during surgery.

    Medical progress through technology·1990
    Same author

    Bartholin's gland abscess in infancy.

    The Pediatric infectious disease journal·1988
    Same author

    Closed-loop control of an anesthesia delivery system: development and animal testing.

    IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering·1987
    Same author

    Computer-assisted continuous infusions of fentanyl during cardiac anesthesia: comparison with a manual method.

    Anesthesiology·1985

    Area of Science:

    • Anesthesiology
    • Medical Engineering

    Background:

    • Nonrebreathing anesthesia systems, exemplified by the Bain system, have a long history and are valued for patient safety due to circuit simplicity.
    • Key disadvantages include high gas flow rates leading to environmental pollution, increased costs, and the inability to accurately quantitate patient uptake of gases.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of nonrebreathing and partial rebreathing anesthesia systems.
    • To explore the potential of closed-circuit anesthesia as a superior method for anesthesia delivery.

    Main Methods:

    • Historical review and comparative analysis of nonrebreathing, partial rebreathing, and closed-circuit anesthesia systems.
    • Discussion of technological advancements in anesthesia machines and monitoring capabilities.

    Main Results:

    • Nonrebreathing systems ensure delivered equals inhaled concentrations but suffer from high flow rate issues.
    • Partial rebreathing systems mitigate some high flow issues but prevent accurate inhaled concentration monitoring and require CO2 absorbers.
    • Closed-circuit anesthesia offers economic, ecologic, and physiologic benefits, with enhanced noninvasive monitoring of patient variables.

    Conclusions:

    • Closed-circuit anesthesia, supported by modern technology, is poised to become the preferred anesthesia delivery method.
    • The primary advantage of closed-circuit anesthesia is its superior ability to monitor patient respiratory and cardiovascular variables noninvasively.
    • Wider adoption of closed-circuit anesthesia by practitioners depends on demonstrating its capacity for improved and more efficient patient care.

    Related Experiment Videos