Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A limitation of position constancy.

R Becklen, H Wallach, D Nitzberg

    Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
    |October 1, 1984
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    The constancy of colored objects in colored illumination.

    Journal of experimental psychology·2010
    Same author

    Identity imposition and its role in a stereokinetic effect.

    Perception & psychophysics·1990
    Same author

    The role of eye movements in the perception of motion and shape.

    Reviews of oculomotor research·1990
    Same author

    Perception of complex motion paths under three conditions of stimulation.

    Perception & psychophysics·1988
    Same author

    The effect of area, separation, and dichoptic presentation on the perception of achromatic color.

    Perception & psychophysics·1988
    Same author

    The role of memory in perceiving subjective contours.

    Perception & psychophysics·1988

    Position constancy, a visual compensation mechanism, fails when eye movements and target motion are not aligned. This research explores how non-colinear movements disrupt the perception of stationary objects during tracking.

    Area of Science:

    • Neuroscience
    • Vision Science
    • Perception

    Background:

    • The human visual system employs position constancy to stabilize perception during eye movements.
    • Normally, when tracking a moving object, the eye movement compensates for the retinal image shift of stationary targets.
    • This compensation prevents misperceiving stationary objects as moving along with the retinal image displacement.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate whether position constancy functions when eye movements and target motion are not colinear.
    • To determine if the visual system's compensation mechanism is disrupted by non-colinear target motion during eye tracking.

    Main Methods:

    • Experimental setup likely involved subjects tracking moving targets under controlled conditions.
    • Varying the direction of target motion relative to the direction of eye movement.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Measuring perceived target motion or stability under these non-colinear conditions.

    • Main Results:

    • Position constancy was found to fail when the direction of target motion was not colinear with eye movement.
    • Evidence suggests that the visual compensation mechanism breaks down when there is an angular difference between eye and target motion.
    • This indicates a limitation in the robustness of position constancy under complex visual tracking scenarios.

    Conclusions:

    • Position constancy is not a fully robust mechanism and is susceptible to failure under specific non-colinear visual conditions.
    • The findings highlight the intricate interplay between eye movements, target motion, and perceived visual stability.
    • Further research is needed to understand the neural basis of these limitations in visual perception.