Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Metacomprehension of text material.

R H Maki, S L Berry

    Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition
    |October 1, 1984
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    High-scoring students accurately predict test performance, especially with delays. Immediate testing shows initial accuracy, but later immediate tests reveal prediction errors, influenced by text structure.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Should headspace Centres Offer Early Intervention for Eating Disorders? Outlining a Key Role for Australia's National Youth Mental Health Foundation in the Roll out of Accessible Care.

    Early intervention in psychiatry·2025
    Same author

    Amino-acid transport into cultured tobacco cells : III. Arginine transport.

    Planta·2013
    Same author

    Processing locational and orientational information.

    Memory & cognition·2013
    Same author

    The relationship between comprehension and metacomprehension ability.

    Psychonomic bulletin & review·2013
    Same author

    Determining the heritable component of dairy cattle foot lesions.

    Journal of dairy science·2012
    Same author

    Efficiency of arithmetic operations in bilinguals as a function of language.

    Memory & cognition·2011
    Same journal

    Memory loves company: Related object pairs benefit working memory.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
    Same journal

    Ranschburg unrepeated.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
    Same journal

    It was the best of times, it was the worst of times: Evidence for switch cost beyond stimulus-response tasks.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
    Same journal

    Testing the predictions of a distinctiveness model of memory: The production effect in backward recall.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
    Same journal

    On the impact of adjacency on transposed-word effects under serial presentation.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
    Same journal

    It's time to opt out: Metacognitive analysis of time regulation under uncertainty.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Cognitive Psychology
    • Educational Psychology
    • Metacognition

    Background:

    • Understanding metacognition is crucial for effective learning.
    • Self-prediction accuracy influences learning strategies and outcomes.
    • Previous research indicates varying levels of self-assessment accuracy in academic contexts.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate students' ability to predict their performance on multiple-choice tests.
    • To examine how retention intervals and text structure affect prediction accuracy.
    • To differentiate prediction accuracy between high- and low-performing students.

    Main Methods:

    • Two experiments were conducted involving subjects reading text and predicting test performance.
    • Experiment 1 assessed prediction accuracy based on median test scores.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Experiment 2 manipulated retention intervals (immediate vs. delayed) and analyzed text structural variables.

    • Main Results:

    • High-scoring students demonstrated prediction accuracy by rating relevant material higher.
    • Prediction accuracy varied with retention interval; immediate testing showed initial accuracy but declined on subsequent tests.
    • Text structural variables (length, position, hierarchy) correlated with predictions but not consistently with performance.

    Conclusions:

    • Metacognitive accuracy in predicting academic performance is context-dependent, influenced by timing and individual differences.
    • Delayed testing appears to support more reliable self-prediction compared to immediate testing.
    • While text structure influences prediction, its direct impact on test performance is less clear, suggesting complex metacognitive interactions.