Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Individual differences in loudness processing and loudness scales.

D Algom, L E Marks

    Journal of Experimental Psychology. General
    |December 1, 1984
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Perception, apperception and psychophysics.

    The Behavioral and brain sciences·2014
    Same author

    The perplexing plurality of psychophysical processes.

    The Behavioral and brain sciences·2014
    Same author

    Anxiety sensitivity and auditory perception of heartbeat.

    Behaviour research and therapy·2006
    Same author

    Valid across-group comparisons with labeled scales: the gLMS versus magnitude matching.

    Physiology & behavior·2004
    Same author

    A confluence of contexts: asymmetric versus global failures of selective attention to stroop dimensions.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2001
    Same author

    The Stroop effect: it is not the robust phenomenon that you have thought it to be.

    Memory & cognition·2001
    Same journal

    Executive function and social behavior: Causal evidence from loading working memory and inhibitory control.

    Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
    Same journal

    Correction to "Your research is public engagement: A case for more intentional science communication in research with human subjects" by Vaughn (2026).

    Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
    Same journal

    Correction to "Costs and benefits of acting extraverted: A randomized controlled trial" by Jacques-Hamilton et al. (2019).

    Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
    Same journal

    Conveying (discrete) emotionality with novel words.

    Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
    Same journal

    Physical actions shape moral choices: Environment-directed movements reduce cheating in young children.

    Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
    Same journal

    From chunks to schemas: Learning in the Hebb repetition paradigm.

    Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
    See all related articles

    Individual differences in loudness perception are mainly due to how people use numbers, not sensory variations. Auditory intensity processing shows significant individual variability.

    Area of Science:

    • Auditory psychophysics
    • Psychoacoustics
    • Sensory perception

    Background:

    • Loudness perception is a fundamental aspect of auditory psychophysics.
    • Understanding interindividual variability in loudness scaling is crucial for psychoacoustic models.
    • Previous research has explored different scales of loudness, such as the sone and lambda scales.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate interindividual differences in loudness perception using psychophysical functions.
    • To compare loudness scaling across binaural summation, temporal summation, and interval judgments.
    • To determine the extent to which variations in loudness scaling reflect sensory representation versus numerical reporting.

    Main Methods:

    • Assessed psychophysical function parameters for loudness of a 1000-Hz tone in individual subjects.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Conducted three experiments: binaural loudness summation, temporal loudness summation, and loudness interval judgments.
  • Analyzed exponents of magnitude-estimation functions and interval judgments, and compared them to binaural summation exponents.

    • Main Results:

    • Loudness scales for binaural summation approximated the sone scale.
    • Scales for interval judgments approximated Garner's lambda scale, differing nonlinearly from binaural scales.
    • Interindividual differences in temporal summation were independent of scaling performance or binaural summation.
    • Exponents of binaural summation showed less variation than those from magnitude estimation or interval judgments.

    Conclusions:

    • Interindividual variation in loudness perception largely stems from differences in numerical reporting strategies, not sensory representation.
    • Sensory representations of loudness appear relatively uniform among individuals with normal hearing.
    • Individual variability in auditory intensity processing, such as temporal summation, can be substantial and comparable to variations in loudness scaling.