Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Does rate of processing determine ease of target detection?

L B Stelmach

    Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
    |February 1, 1984
    PubMed
    Summary

    Ease of target detection depends on brightness, not duration. Experiments show brightness differences are key, reversing Krumhansl

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Monovision: a review of the scientific literature.

    Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry·2001
    Same author

    Unequal weighting of monocular inputs in binocular combination: implications for the compression of stereoscopic imagery.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2001
    Same author

    Control' of reflexive and voluntary saccades in the gap effect.

    Perception & psychophysics·1999
    Same author

    Display duration and stereoscopic depth discrimination.

    Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale·1998
    Same author

    Viewing behavior: ocular and attentional disengagement.

    Perception & psychophysics·1993
    Same author

    Directed attention and perception of temporal order.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·1991

    Area of Science:

    • Cognitive Psychology
    • Visual Perception

    Background:

    • Krumhansl (1982) suggested target detection ease inversely relates to contextual element exposure duration.
    • Krumhansl's findings were confounded by covaried brightness and duration.
    • This limits unambiguous conclusions regarding the effect of duration alone.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To independently investigate the effects of brightness and duration on target detection.
    • To clarify the role of brightness versus duration in visual search tasks.

    Main Methods:

    • Two experiments were conducted, independently varying brightness and duration.
    • Brightness levels were manipulated across different exposure durations.
    • Target detection performance was measured under controlled visual conditions.

    Main Results:

    • Brightness differences were found to be both necessary and sufficient for Krumhansl's observed relationships.
    • When brightness was equalized, the relationship between duration and detection ease reversed.
    • Duration alone did not consistently predict target detection ease.

    Conclusions:

    • Brightness, not exposure duration, is the primary factor influencing target detection ease in this context.
    • Krumhansl's model accurately predicts effects of brightness but not duration.
    • Visual search performance is significantly modulated by luminance contrast.

    Related Experiment Videos