Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Specimen damage considerations in biological microprobe analysis.

Scanning Electron Microscopy

|January 1, 1980

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Elemental analysis using differential absorption techniques.

Biological trace element research·2013

Same author

Pseudo-single-bunch with adjustable frequency: a new operation mode for synchrotron light sources.

Physical review letters·2013

Same author

Advantages of a synchrotron bending magnet as the sample illuminator for a wide-field X-ray microscope.

Journal of synchrotron radiation·2012

Same author

An assessment of the resolution limitation due to radiation-damage in x-ray diffraction microscopy.

Journal of electron spectroscopy and related phenomena·2011

Same author

Coherent Radiation for X-Ray Imaging-The Soft X-Ray Undulator and the X1A Beamline at the NSLS.

Journal of X-ray science and technology·2011

Same author

Soft x-ray absorption cross section of argon determined by a variable absorber technique.

Applied optics·2010

Same journal

Statoconia formation in molluscan statocysts.

Scanning electron microscopy·1986

Same journal

Statolith formation in Cnidaria: effects of cadmium on Aurelia statoliths.

Scanning electron microscopy·1986

Same journal

Phase transitions of calcium oxalate trihydrate and epitaxy in the weddellite-whewellite system.

Scanning electron microscopy·1986

Same journal

Experimental investigation of the genesis of struvite stones in cats.

Scanning electron microscopy·1986

Same journal

Analysis of canine urinary stones using infrared spectroscopy and scanning electron microscopy.

Scanning electron microscopy·1986

Same journal

Otoconia as test masses in biological accelerometers: what can we learn about their formation from evolutionary studies and from work in microgravity?

Scanning electron microscopy·1986

See all related articles

Radiation damage in biological materials can be minimized by choosing the right microanalysis technique. X-ray fluorescence is best for heavy elements, while electron energy loss spectroscopy or X-ray absorption microanalysis suit light elements.

Area of Science:

Materials Science
Analytical Chemistry
Biophysics

Background:

Radiation damage significantly impacts the resolution and accuracy of microanalytical measurements in biological samples.
Understanding the specimen dose is crucial for selecting appropriate experimental techniques.

Purpose of the Study:

To compare the radiation dose delivered by different microanalytical techniques to biological specimens.
To identify the least destructive methods for elemental analysis based on specimen composition.

Main Methods:

Calculation of specimen dose using a simplified model for various experimental arrangements.
Evaluation of electron probe X-ray microanalysis, proton probe X-ray microanalysis, X-ray fluorescence, electron energy loss spectroscopy, and X-ray absorption microanalysis.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

Electron and proton probe X-ray microanalysis result in high specimen doses.
X-ray fluorescence with a polarized, monochromatic X-ray probe is least destructive for medium to heavy elements.
Electron energy loss spectroscopy and X-ray absorption microanalysis offer the lowest doses for light elements (Z ≤ 20).

Conclusions:

The choice of microanalytical technique should be guided by the element of interest (light vs. medium/heavy) to minimize radiation damage.
X-ray fluorescence and electron energy loss spectroscopy/X-ray absorption microanalysis represent optimal choices for specific elemental ranges, preserving sample integrity.