Usefulness of electrophysiological studies in the diagnosis of lumbosacral root disease

Clinical, electrophysiological, and myelographic findings were correlated in 57 patients with the clinical diagnosis of lumbosacral root disease. Conventional motor and sensory (including sural nerve) conduction studies were normal in all patients. Electromyography, late response studies in different muscles of the lower extremity, the myelogram, or combinations of these tests were abnormal in 44 patients (77%). Of 36 patients (63%) with abnormal myelograms, 14 had normal electrophysiological studies. Twenty-nine (51%) had an abnormal electrophysiological or myelographic finding; although 8 patients in this group had a normal myelogram, 2 had an abnormal discogram and 1 an abnormal epidurogram. Electrophysiological or myelographic findings, in some cases both, correlated well with clinical signs and symptoms in 41 patients (72%). H-reflex and F response studies, when abnormal, helped in localizing a lesion in the appropriate root distribution.