Related Experiment Videos
Relationships between child-rearing styles and child behavior over time.
American Journal of Diseases of Children (1960)
|February 1, 1978
Summary
Authoritarian and accommodative parenting styles showed no significant differences in child behavioral problems. However, positive descriptions emerged for boys with accommodative and girls with authoritarian styles, suggesting nuanced effects.
Area of Science:
- Child Psychology
- Developmental Psychology
- Parenting Styles
Background:
- Parenting styles, such as authoritarian and accommodative, are theorized to impact child development and behavior.
- Previous research suggests potential links between specific parenting approaches and behavioral outcomes in children.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the hypothesis that authoritarian child-rearing styles lead to more home and school problems compared to accommodative styles.
- To examine the long-term effects of different parenting styles on children's behavioral adjustment.
Main Methods:
- A longitudinal study followed 135 children from age 2 into first grade.
- Data collected through follow-up observations to assess home and school functioning.
- Maternal and teacher reports were used to describe children's behavior.
Main Results:
- No significant differences in home or school malfunctioning were found between children raised with authoritarian versus accommodative styles.
- Mothers described boys raised with accommodative styles more positively than those raised with authoritarian styles.
- First-grade teachers described girls raised with accommodative styles more positively than those raised with authoritarian styles.
Conclusions:
- Parenting styles, specifically authoritarian and accommodative, do not appear to be strong predictors of significant behavioral problems in children.
- Physicians should respect diverse parenting approaches and only intervene if there is clear evidence of harm.
- Current findings do not support widespread interventions aimed at altering parental authority styles.