Related Experiment Videos
Immunofluorescence staining for detection of variola virus
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
|April 1, 1981
Summary
A new immunofluorescence (IF) staining technique showed 100% sensitivity for diagnosing variola major smallpox. However, due to a high rate of false positives, IF is not recommended as a routine screening test for smallpox eradication efforts.
Area of Science:
- Virology
- Epidemiology
- Public Health
Background:
- In 1975, Bangladesh was the last country with endemic variola major smallpox, nearing eradication.
- Existing diagnostic methods included immunodiffusion and embryonated egg culture.
- A rapid and accurate laboratory diagnostic method was needed.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of a new immunofluorescence (IF) staining technique for diagnosing smallpox.
- To assess the sensitivity and specificity of IF compared to clinical diagnosis and reference laboratory testing.
Main Methods:
- Collected laboratory specimens (scabs, vesicular/pustular impressions) from suspected smallpox patients.
- Performed immunofluorescence (IF) staining on specimens.
- Reinvestigated IF-positive cases and sent subsamples to a WHO reference laboratory for confirmation.
Main Results:
- Out of 144 specimens, 78 tested IF positive for smallpox.
- The IF technique demonstrated 100% sensitivity (no false negatives) for variola major.
- A high rate of false-positive results was observed with the IF technique.
Conclusions:
- The immunofluorescence (IF) technique is highly sensitive for detecting variola major.
- The high false-positive rate of IF precludes its recommendation as a routine screening test for smallpox.
- Accurate laboratory diagnostics are crucial for disease eradication campaigns.