Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Interhemispheric pathways in simple reaction time to lateralized light flash.

A D Milner, C R Lines

    Neuropsychologia
    |January 1, 1982
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    How do the two visual streams interact with each other?

    Experimental brain research·2017
    Same author

    The nature and limits of orientation and pattern processing supporting visuomotor control in a visual form agnosic.

    Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2013
    Same author

    Is visual processing in the dorsal stream accessible to consciousness?

    Proceedings. Biological sciences·2012
    Same author

    The effects of pre-treatment with enalapril maleate on scopolamine-induced cognitive deficits in healthy volunteers.

    Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England)·2012
    Same author

    The effects of scopolamine on retrieval from semantic memory.

    Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England)·2012
    Same author

    The scopolamine model of dementia: chronic transdermal administration.

    Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England)·2011
    Same journal

    Prevalence and modulation of rat off-track head scanning on linear tracks: possible implications for representational and dynamic properties of hippocampal place cells.

    Neuropsychologia·2026
    Same journal

    Identifying networks within an fMRI multivariate searchlight analysis.

    Neuropsychologia·2026
    Same journal

    Modulating sentence comprehension in people with aphasia through anodal tDCS: A double-blind randomized cross-over study.

    Neuropsychologia·2026
    Same journal

    Deficient processing of regularity violations during visuospatial neglect: a visual mismatch negativity study.

    Neuropsychologia·2026
    Same journal

    Seeing is believing: mental imagery amplifies moral, emotional, and motivational responding to mentally constructed hypothetical events.

    Neuropsychologia·2026
    Same journal

    From past recall to future projection: What does verb tense production reveal about mental time travel in Alzheimer's disease?

    Neuropsychologia·2026
    See all related articles

    This study investigated reaction times to visual stimuli. Vocal responses showed intensity-dependent differences, suggesting a method for estimating visual pathway transmission times.

    Area of Science:

    • Cognitive Neuroscience
    • Visual Perception
    • Human Reaction Time Studies

    Background:

    • Reaction time (RT) is a fundamental measure in cognitive psychology.
    • Visual stimuli processing involves complex neural pathways, including interhemispheric transfer.
    • Understanding how stimulus intensity affects RT and interhemispheric processing is crucial.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To measure simple reaction time to visual stimuli presented in different visual fields.
    • To examine the influence of light intensity on reaction times.
    • To investigate whether vocal responses offer unique insights into visual commissural transmission compared to motor responses.

    Main Methods:

    • Two experiments were conducted measuring simple reaction time.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Experiment 1 used finger movement as the response, while Experiment 2 used a spoken word.
  • Stimuli were presented to either the left or right visual field across varying light intensities.

    • Main Results:

    • In Experiment 1 (finger movement), the 'uncrossed' reaction time advantage over 'crossed' RT was consistent across light intensities.
    • In Experiment 2 (vocal response), the right visual field advantage over the left visual field varied inversely with light intensity.
    • This intensity-dependent effect in vocal RT suggests differential processing or transmission.

    Conclusions:

    • Vocal reaction times are more sensitive to variations in visual field stimulus intensity than motor responses.
    • The findings suggest that vocal responses may provide a novel method for estimating visual commissural transmission time.
    • Interhemispheric communication in the visual system may be modulated by stimulus intensity and response modality.