Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cervical sarcoma: a review.

J Rotmensch, N B Rosenshein, J D Woodruff

    Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey
    |August 1, 1983
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Diagnosis and treatment of cervical sarcomas lack standardized criteria, leading to poor patient outcomes. Further research is needed to establish clear diagnostic guidelines for better therapeutic evaluation.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Controversies associated with cervical cytologic screening: a physician's view.

    American journal of clinical pathology·2002
    Same author

    Phase I study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, paclitaxel, and cisplatin in patients with advanced solid tumors.

    Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2002
    Same author

    Contemporary management of ovarian cancer.

    Obstetrics and gynecology clinics of North America·2002
    Same author

    Outcome and management of pathological stage I endometrial carcinoma patients with involvement of the lower uterine segment.

    Gynecologic oncology·2001
    Same author

    Phase I trial of concomitant vinorelbine, paclitaxel, and pelvic irradiation in cervical carcinoma and other advanced pelvic malignancies.

    Gynecologic oncology·2001
    Same author

    Outcome of endometrial carcinoma patients with involvement of the uterine serosa.

    Gynecologic oncology·2001
    Same journal

    Amniotic Fluid Embolism: A Silent Threat to Maternal Life- An Up-to-Date Comprehensive Review of the Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Outcome.

    Obstetrical & gynecological survey·2026
    Same journal

    A System Review of Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Clinical Management of Intrauterine Adhesions.

    Obstetrical & gynecological survey·2026
    Same journal

    Atrial Fibrillation and Atrial Flutter in Pregnancy: Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Management.

    Obstetrical & gynecological survey·2026
    Same journal

    Heavy Menstrual Bleeding in the Gynecology Clinic: A Call for Awareness and Standardized Screening for Underlying Bleeding Disorders.

    Obstetrical & gynecological survey·2026
    Same journal

    Uterine Sarcomas: Clinical Management and a Review of Systemic Therapy.

    Obstetrical & gynecological survey·2026
    Same journal

    Female Sexual Dysfunction: Current Models and Treatment Options.

    Obstetrical & gynecological survey·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Gynecologic Oncology
    • Pathology
    • Oncologic Therapies

    Background:

    • Cervical sarcomas are rare malignancies with poorly defined diagnostic criteria.
    • Current management strategies for these tumors are varied and lack standardization.
    • The overall prognosis for patients with cervical sarcomas is generally poor.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To review existing cases of cervical sarcomas.
    • To highlight the lack of standardized diagnostic criteria.
    • To emphasize the need for improved diagnostic and therapeutic evaluation methods.

    Main Methods:

    • Retrospective review of 96 cases of cervical sarcomas.
    • Analysis of diagnostic criteria employed across cases.
    • Assessment of therapeutic interventions and patient prognoses.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • Significant variability in diagnostic criteria was observed.
    • A wide range of treatment modalities were utilized.
    • The overall prognosis across the reviewed cases was poor.

    Conclusions:

    • Cervical sarcomas represent a complex group of tumors requiring precise definition.
    • Establishment of rigid diagnostic criteria is essential.
    • Standardized diagnostic and therapeutic approaches are necessary to improve patient outcomes.