Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Work-related diseases--some problems in study design.

S Hernberg

    Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health
    |December 1, 1984
    PubMed
    Summary

    Studying occupational diseases is challenging due to small effect sizes and study design limitations. Methodological issues, particularly in cross-sectional studies, hinder the accurate identification of work-related illness causes.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Induction and expression of cyclin D3 in human pancreatic cancer.

    Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology·2001
    Same author

    Work-related factors and mortality -- what is the burden?

    Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health·2001
    Same author

    Lead poisoning in a historical perspective.

    American journal of industrial medicine·2000
    Same author

    Towards a new millennium.

    Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health·2000
    Same author

    Differentiation of islet cells in long-term culture.

    Pancreas·2000
    Same author

    Inconclusive cancer epidemiology.

    Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health·1998

    Area of Science:

    • Epidemiology
    • Occupational Health
    • Public Health

    Background:

    • Investigating work-related diseases presents significant methodological challenges.
    • The occupational etiologic fraction for many diseases is small, making detection difficult.
    • Existing study designs often struggle to isolate the impact of occupational exposures.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To address key methodological problems in the epidemiologic study of work-related diseases.
    • To highlight the difficulties in demonstrating the occupational contribution to disease.
    • To discuss specific challenges related to common disease groups.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of epidemiological study designs and their limitations.
    • Analysis of confounding factors and biases in occupational disease research.
    • Detailed examination of issues in studying specific disease categories.

    Main Results:

    • Cross-sectional studies are particularly susceptible to diluting effects, such as job-related selection bias.
    • Demonstrating a causal link between occupational exposures and disease is often statistically challenging.
    • Methodological hurdles impact the reliable assessment of work-relatedness for various conditions.

    Conclusions:

    • Improved epidemiological methods are crucial for accurately identifying and quantifying work-related diseases.
    • Addressing selection bias and small effect sizes is essential for robust occupational health research.
    • Understanding these methodological limitations is key to advancing the field of occupational epidemiology.

    Related Experiment Videos