Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Vision evaluation using contrast sensitivity functions.

J P Comerford

    American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics
    |May 1, 1983
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Visual field defects detected in patients with Gilles de la Tourette syndrome: preliminary report.

    International ophthalmology·1989
    Same author

    Effect of luminance level on contrast sensitivity in myopia.

    American journal of optometry and physiological optics·1987
    Same author

    High myopia does not affect contrast sensitivity.

    Current eye research·1986
    Same author

    Use of various measures of visual acuity and contrast sensitivity in the evaluation of monocular occlusion and active vision training of three adult amblyopes.

    American journal of optometry and physiological optics·1983
    Same author

    Contrast sensitivity functions for clinical optometry.

    Journal of the American Optometric Association·1979
    Same author

    Flicker photometry of equally bright lights.

    Vision research·1975
    Same journal

    Visual decrement with deposit accumulation of HEMA contact lenses.

    American journal of optometry and physiological optics·1988
    Same journal

    Stiles-Burch two-degree color mixture data.

    American journal of optometry and physiological optics·1988
    Same journal

    Undercorrection and myopia development.

    American journal of optometry and physiological optics·1988
    Same journal

    The International Optometric and Optical League.

    American journal of optometry and physiological optics·1988
    Same journal

    Quantitative photorefraction using an off-center flash source.

    American journal of optometry and physiological optics·1988
    Same journal

    An objective VER assessment of visual acuity compared with subjective measures.

    American journal of optometry and physiological optics·1988
    See all related articles

    Contrast Sensitivity Functions (CSF) offer a theoretically superior method for vision evaluation compared to traditional acuity tests. However, their clinical adoption is limited due to challenges in measurement and interpretation.

    Area of Science:

    • Ophthalmology
    • Vision Science
    • Clinical Measurement

    Background:

    • Contrast Sensitivity Functions (CSF) are a theoretically advanced metric for assessing visual function.
    • Traditional visual acuity tests like Snellen charts have limitations in comprehensively evaluating vision.
    • Despite their potential, CSF's are not widely implemented in clinical practice.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To review the clinical applications of CSF in various conditions.
    • To identify and discuss the challenges associated with CSF measurement.
    • To explore the difficulties in interpreting CSF results for clinical decision-making.

    Main Methods:

    • Literature review of studies utilizing CSF in clinical settings.
    • Analysis of methodologies employed for CSF measurement.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of case studies and clinical interpretations of CSF data.

    • Main Results:

    • CSF has been applied to a range of clinical conditions, demonstrating its potential utility.
    • Significant challenges exist in standardizing CSF measurement protocols.
    • Interpretation of CSF results can be complex and lacks universal consensus.

    Conclusions:

    • CSF offers valuable insights into visual function beyond simple acuity.
    • Standardization of measurement techniques and interpretation guidelines are crucial for wider clinical adoption.
    • Further research is needed to overcome current limitations and facilitate routine use of CSF in vision evaluation.