Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Randomised controlled trial of physiological and ventricular pacing.

E J Perrins, C A Morley, S L Chan

    British Heart Journal
    |August 1, 1983
    PubMed
    Summary

    Atrial synchronous pacing significantly improves exercise capacity and well-being compared to ventricular pacing. This physiological pacing mode offers superior benefits for patients requiring chronic pacing therapy.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    A framework for clinical care pathway renewal: an example from inflammatory bowel disease.

    BMC medical research methodology·2025
    Same author

    Anaesthetic subspecialties and sustainable healthcare: a narrative review.

    Anaesthesia·2024
    Same author

    The KMT2A recombinome of acute leukemias in 2023.

    Leukemia·2023
    Same author

    Syncope presenting to the emergency department.

    Journal of internal medicine·2021
    Same author

    Converting gas-driven ventilators from oxygen to air: environmental implications.

    Anaesthesia·2020
    Same author

    Covid-19-related pancreatic injury.

    The British journal of surgery·2020

    Area of Science:

    • Cardiology
    • Biomedical Engineering
    • Clinical Research

    Background:

    • Chronic pacing therapy is essential for managing bradyarrhythmias.
    • Traditional ventricular pacing can lead to suboptimal physiological response.
    • Atrial synchronous pacing aims to mimic the heart's natural rhythm.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To compare the efficacy of atrial synchronous pacing versus ventricular pacing.
    • To evaluate the impact of pacing modes on exercise capacity.
    • To assess symptomatic improvements in patients undergoing chronic pacing.

    Main Methods:

    • Randomized, double-blind, cross-over study design.
    • Thirteen patients completed the study protocol.
    • Comparison of maximal symptom-limited exercise and patient-reported symptoms.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • Maximal exercise capacity significantly increased with atrial synchronous pacing.
    • Patient-reported symptoms (shortness of breath, palpitations, well-being) improved significantly.
    • Atrial synchronous pacing demonstrated superiority over ventricular pacing.

    Conclusions:

    • Atrial synchronous pacing is superior to ventricular pacing for improving exercise capacity and symptoms.
    • Physiological pacing offers significant benefits for patients.
    • This study supports the use of atrial synchronous pacing in clinical practice.