Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Abdominal vagotomy does not modify endotoxic shock in rats.

A B Pitterman, G Friedlander, G Kelly

    Life Sciences
    |September 12, 1983
    PubMed
    Summary

    This study investigated whether cutting the abdominal vagus nerve could protect rats from the severe, often fatal, effects of endotoxic shock. Researchers found that this surgical procedure did not change the clinical outcomes or survival rates of the animals. These findings suggest that the vagus nerve does not transmit the signals responsible for low blood pressure during this type of shock.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    The Last Laugh - Reversible myeloneuropathy induced by chronic nitrous oxide use.

    Acute medicine·2019
    Same author

    Proteome dataset of subcutaneous adipose tissue obtained from late pregnant dairy cows during summer heat stress and winter seasons.

    Data in brief·2017
    Same author

    Seasonal heat stress affects adipose tissue proteome toward enrichment of the Nrf2-mediated oxidative stress response in late-pregnant dairy cows.

    Journal of proteomics·2017
    Same author

    Estimated or Measured GFR in Living Kidney Donors Work-up?

    American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons·2016
    Same author

    Left ventricular assist device exchange for persistent infection: a case series and review of the literature.

    Transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society·2014
    Same author

    Ion channels in southern bean mosaic virus capsid.

    Biophysical journal·2009

    Area of Science:

    • Gastroenterology research within abdominal vagotomy studies
    • Immunology and systemic inflammatory response research

    Background:

    The precise pathways transmitting peripheral inflammatory signals to the brain during systemic infection remain poorly understood. Scientists have long debated if the vagus nerve serves as a primary conduit for these dangerous physiological alerts. Prior research has shown that endotoxins trigger rapid, severe drops in blood pressure throughout the body. That uncertainty drove investigators to test if severing these specific neural connections might offer protective benefits. No prior work had resolved whether abdominal nerve pathways are required for the development of shock symptoms. This investigation addresses the potential role of neural signaling in mediating host responses to bacterial toxins. Establishing these connections is vital for understanding how the brain detects and reacts to widespread infection. Clarifying these mechanisms may help refine future therapeutic strategies for managing life-threatening inflammatory conditions.

    Purpose Of The Study:

    The aim of this study was to determine if abdominal vagotomy could mitigate the severity of endotoxic shock in a rat model. Researchers sought to clarify whether the vagus nerve acts as a conduit for inflammatory signals during systemic infection. The investigation was motivated by the need to understand how the brain receives information regarding bacterial toxins. A specific problem exists in identifying the exact pathways that trigger rapid, centrally mediated drops in blood pressure. The authors hypothesized that if the vagus nerve were involved, its removal would alter the clinical outcome. This study addresses the uncertainty surrounding the role of peripheral neural pathways in acute inflammatory responses. By testing this hypothesis, the team aimed to define the contribution of the vagus nerve to the development of shock. The work provides a necessary evaluation of whether surgical intervention can interrupt the signaling cascade that leads to hypotension.

    Keywords:
    systemic inflammationneural signalingbacterial toxinshypotension

    Frequently Asked Questions

    The researchers propose that cutting the abdominal vagus nerve does not alter the survival or clinical progression of endotoxic shock. This outcome indicates that the nerve is not the primary pathway for transmitting hypotensive signals during such infections.

    The study utilized Sprague-Dawley rats as the experimental model to assess the role of the vagus nerve. These animals were subjected to intravenous injections of E. coli lipopolysaccharide to induce a systemic inflammatory response.

    The authors suggest that the vagus nerve is not a necessary conduit for the hypotensive response. This technical necessity is absent because the shock symptoms persist even after the nerve is surgically severed.

    The researchers used intravenous injections of lipopolysaccharide to simulate the physiological conditions of endotoxic shock. This data type allows for a controlled assessment of how the body reacts to bacterial toxins in the absence of vagal signaling.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Methods:

    The review approach involved examining the physiological responses of Sprague-Dawley rats following specific surgical procedures. Investigators performed bilateral subdiaphragmatic nerve transections to isolate the impact of the vagus nerve. The team administered intravenous injections of E. coli lipopolysaccharide to initiate a controlled inflammatory state. Researchers monitored the subjects for changes in clinical status and overall mortality rates. This design allowed for a direct comparison between the surgical group and non-surgical controls. The approach focused on identifying whether the nerve fibers were required for the observed hypotensive reaction. Data collection emphasized the timing and severity of the systemic response to the bacterial agent. The methodology ensured that the influence of the vagus nerve could be clearly distinguished from other potential signaling mechanisms.

    Main Results:

    Key findings from the literature demonstrate that bilateral subdiaphragmatic nerve transection fails to improve the clinical progression of subjects. The study shows that survival rates remain unaffected by the surgical procedure after exposure to bacterial toxins. These results indicate that the vagus nerve does not convey signals that trigger the hypotensive response. The data reveal that the clinical course is identical between the experimental and control groups. The researchers observed no significant differences in the physiological decline of the animals. These findings suggest that the pathways responsible for shock operate independently of the abdominal vagal afferent fibers. The evidence confirms that the nerve is not involved in the mediation of the systemic response to the toxin. The results provide a definitive assessment of the role of these specific neural connections in acute inflammation.

    Conclusions:

    The authors propose that abdominal vagal afferent fibers do not carry signals that generate hypotensive responses during endotoxic shock. This synthesis and implications framing suggests that the vagus nerve is not a necessary component for the systemic reaction to bacterial toxins. The evidence indicates that clinical outcomes remain unchanged regardless of the surgical intervention performed on these specific nerve branches. These findings imply that alternative pathways must be responsible for relaying inflammatory information to the central nervous system. The researchers conclude that the vagus nerve does not influence the survival rates of subjects exposed to these specific bacterial agents. This review of the literature supports the view that the vagus nerve is not involved in the mediation of shock. The study provides a clear boundary for the known functions of the vagus nerve during acute inflammatory events. Future research should focus on identifying the non-vagal routes that facilitate these rapid systemic physiological changes.

    The measurement of clinical course and survival rates served as the primary indicators of shock severity. These metrics allowed the team to determine if the surgical procedure offered any protective benefit against the toxin.

    The authors state that their findings imply that peripheral signals for hypotension are not relayed through abdominal vagal afferent fibers. This conclusion suggests that other, non-vagal pathways must be responsible for communicating these inflammatory alerts to the brain.