Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparative study of gingival retraction methods.

R Azzi, T F Tsao, F A Carranza

    The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
    |October 1, 1983
    PubMed
    Summary

    Rotary gingival curettage caused clinical gum recession in dogs, unlike electrosurgery or retraction cords. All tested methods caused minor tissue damage, but no apical migration of the junctional epithelium was observed.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Fine Structural Localization of Thiamine Pyrophosphatase in Normal Human Gingiva.

    Journal of periodontology·2018
    Same author

    Foreword.

    Journal of periodontology·2018
    Same author

    Letter to the Editors.

    Journal of periodontology·2018
    Same author

    [Clinical experiences with reinsertion; experiments with penicillin].

    Revista odontologica·2014
    Same author

    [Certain histological principles for radiographic interpretation in periodontology].

    Revista odontologica·2014
    Same author

    [Paradentosis in general practice; questions and answers].

    Revista odontologica·2014

    Area of Science:

    • Periodontology
    • Oral Surgery
    • Veterinary Dentistry

    Background:

    • Gingival retraction techniques are crucial for dental procedures.
    • Understanding the tissue response to different retraction methods is essential for minimizing iatrogenic damage.
    • Electrosurgery, retraction cords, and rotary curettage are common methods for gingival retraction.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To compare the clinical and histological effects of electrosurgery, retraction cord, and rotary gingival curettage in dogs.
    • To evaluate the potential for tissue damage and gingival recession associated with these techniques.

    Main Methods:

    • Clinical and histological examinations were performed on dogs following the application of electrosurgery, retraction cord, and rotary gingival curettage.
    • Postoperative observation periods ranged from 6 hours to 14 days.

    Main Results:

    • All tested methods resulted in some degree of minor tissue damage.
    • Significant clinical gingival recession was observed exclusively with the rotary gingival curettage technique.
    • No apical migration of the junctional epithelium was detected across all methods.

    Conclusions:

    • Rotary gingival curettage is associated with clinically significant gingival recession in dogs.
    • Electrosurgery and retraction cords appear to cause less severe gingival recession compared to rotary curettage.
    • Further research may be needed to optimize gingival retraction techniques to minimize iatrogenic effects.

    Related Experiment Videos