Related Experiment Videos
Histological sampling with a 23 gauge modified Menghini needle.
The British Journal of Radiology
|February 1, 1984
Summary
The Surecut needle biopsy effectively obtains tissue for diagnosing abdominal masses, offering high accuracy for malignancy detection and valuable histological detail. It may replace fine needle aspiration biopsy for these lesions.
Area of Science:
- Gastroenterology
- Radiology
- Pathology
Background:
- Abdominal mass lesions detected via ultrasound require accurate diagnosis.
- Conventional fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) provides cytological samples.
- Histological core biopsies can offer more detailed diagnostic information.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the diagnostic efficacy of a modified Menghini (Surecut) needle biopsy with conventional FNAB.
- To evaluate the yield and accuracy of histological versus cytological examination for abdominal masses.
- To assess the additional diagnostic information provided by histological samples.
Main Methods:
- A 23-gauge modified Menghini (Surecut) needle biopsy was compared to FNAB.
- 30 consecutive cases of ultrasonically detected abdominal mass lesions were analyzed.
- Adequacy of material for histology and cytology was assessed.
- Diagnostic accuracy and predictive value for malignancy were calculated.
Main Results:
- Adequate histological material was obtained in 87% of cases; adequate cytological material in 97%.
- Diagnostic accuracy for malignancy was 84% for histology and 89% for cytology.
- The predictive value of malignancy was 100% for both techniques.
- Histology provided additional tumor type and origin information in malignant cases and lesion type in benign cases.
Conclusions:
- The Surecut needle biopsy is valuable for obtaining histological material from abdominal masses.
- It can supplement or potentially replace FNAB for diagnosing these lesions.
- Histological analysis offers crucial details beyond cytological examination.