Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Standardized interviews in psychiatry.

J E Helzer

    Psychiatric Developments
    |January 1, 1983
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Structured interviews in psychiatry enhance diagnostic reliability and data completeness in research and clinical settings. Their growing popularity reflects the need for precise diagnostic criteria in mental health.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    A low-cost, sustainable intervention for drinking reduction in the HIV primary care setting.

    AIDS care·2006
    Same author

    Comparison of drinking patterns measured by daily reports and timeline follow back.

    Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors·2000
    Same author

    Cycles of alcohol dependence: frequency-domain analyses of daily drinking logs for matched alcohol-dependent and nondependent subjects.

    Journal of studies on alcohol·1995
    Same author

    Self-report of drinking using touch-tone telephone: extending the limits of reliable daily contact.

    Journal of studies on alcohol·1995
    Same author

    The DSM-IV field trial for substance use disorders: major results.

    Drug and alcohol dependence·1995
    Same author

    Comparison of alcohol dependence in subjects from clinical, community, and family studies.

    Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research·1994
    Same journal

    The Phobic Avoidance Rating Scale: a psychometric evaluation of an interview-based scale.

    Psychiatric developments·1989
    Same journal

    The sexual differentiation of social play.

    Psychiatric developments·1989
    Same journal

    Measurement of negative symptoms in schizophrenia.

    Psychiatric developments·1989
    Same journal

    Hyperactivity of the left striato-pallidal projection. Part I: Lower level theory.

    Psychiatric developments·1989
    Same journal

    The concept of mental illness.

    Psychiatric developments·1989
    Same journal

    Genetic linkage studies in bipolar disorder: a review.

    Psychiatric developments·1989
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Psychiatry
    • Clinical Psychology
    • Medical Informatics

    Background:

    • Structured interviews for psychiatric data collection have gained prominence over the past decade.
    • Their historical use provides a foundation for current applications in mental health research and practice.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To define structured interviews and review their historical application in psychiatry.
    • To evaluate the benefits of structured interviews in enhancing data reliability, comprehensiveness, and reducing examiner bias.
    • To discuss the scope and limitations of commonly used instruments and future directions.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of definitions and historical usage of structured interviews.
    • Analysis of evidence supporting the impact of structured interviews on data quality.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of specific instruments like PSE, SADS, and DIS, including their applications and limitations.

    • Main Results:

    • Structured interviews significantly improve the reliability of symptom reporting and diagnostic accuracy in research.
    • They enhance the comprehensiveness of clinical data and minimize examiner bias.
    • Evidence suggests benefits in routine clinical settings outweigh potential drawbacks.

    Conclusions:

    • Structured interviews are valuable tools for improving data quality and diagnostic accuracy in psychiatry.
    • Their use is crucial for advancing research and clinical practice through precisely defined diagnostic criteria.
    • Continued development of structured interview instruments is essential for future progress in mental health.