Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Priorities in plastic surgery.

M F Freshwater

    Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
    |June 1, 1984
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Historical plastic surgery advancements should be evaluated by established principles, not just dates. Applying these principles to key developments offers a clearer understanding of plastic surgery

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Preferred terminology for medical journals.

    The Journal of hand surgery, European volume·2015
    Same author

    Re: Renfree KJ. Percutaneous in situ versus open arthrodesis of the distal interphalangeal joint. J Hand Surg Eur. Epub ahead of print 18 March 2014. DOI: 10.1177/1753193414527387.

    The Journal of hand surgery, European volume·2015
    Same author

    Re: Al-Qattan MM. Concurrent dorsal dimelia in 160 consecutive patients with congenital anomalies of the hands and feet. J Hand Surg Eur 2013. Epub ahead of print 20 December 2013. DOI: 10.1177/1753193413517458.

    The Journal of hand surgery, European volume·2014
    Same author

    New editor--new enforcement of ethical standards?

    Chirurgie de la main·2013
    Same author

    Further clarification of quantitative burn wound biopsies.

    Annals of plastic surgery·2010
    Same author

    Age distribution of experimental animals in nerve repairs.

    The Journal of hand surgery·2009

    Area of Science:

    • Plastic Surgery
    • Medical History
    • Surgical Innovation

    Background:

    • Assessing the historical development of plastic surgery requires a framework beyond simple chronological timelines.
    • Understanding the evolution of plastic surgery necessitates an evaluation based on foundational principles.

    Observation:

    • Two significant milestones in plastic surgery were analyzed using established principles.
    • The application of core surgical tenets to historical plastic surgery landmarks was examined.

    Findings:

    • Historical priorities in plastic surgery are best understood through the lens of established principles.
    • Chronological order alone is insufficient for evaluating the significance of plastic surgery advancements.

    Implications:

    Related Experiment Videos

    • This principle-based approach provides a robust method for analyzing other historical developments in plastic surgery.
    • Encouraging the use of established principles will enhance the rigor of historical research in plastic surgery.
    • Future studies on plastic surgery history should adopt this methodology for accurate assessment.