Related Experiment Videos
External threat and the definition of deviance
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
|May 1, 1984
Summary
External threats increase group solidarity by leading to the rejection and negative definition of deviant members. This societal reaction impacts group dynamics and cohesion.
Area of Science:
- Social Psychology
- Sociology
- Group Dynamics
Background:
- Previous research indicates external threats can cause groups to reject deviants and alter communication.
- The study integrates Simmel's conflict theory with the societal reaction approach to deviance.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine how threat levels influence group responses to deviance.
- To investigate the roles of deviant status, nonconformity, and high-status actors in deviance designation.
- To understand the impact of rejection and negative definition on group solidarity.
Main Methods:
- An experimental design with three conditions: strong threat, weak threat, and no threat.
- Analysis of sociometric rejection, negative definition of deviants, and group solidarity.
Main Results:
- Higher threat levels correlated with increased rejection and negative definition of deviants.
- High-status actors played a significant role in the rejection process.
- Group solidarity was linked to the extent of rejection and negative definition.
Conclusions:
- External threats intensify in-group cohesion by facilitating the exclusion of deviant members.
- Findings support the societal reaction approach and offer insights into group conflict resolution.
- The study highlights the interplay between threat, deviance, and group solidarity.