Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Insanity defense in Canada.

J Arboleda-Florez

    Canadian Psychiatric Association Journal
    |February 1, 1978
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Developing a universally accepted criminal responsibility test is challenging, particularly within Canadian law. Section 16, a variation of the M'Naghten rule, and Section 215 concerning provocation, highlight legal adaptations for emotional states impacting intent.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    A Day in the Life of an Academic Psychiatrist.

    Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry·2017
    Same author

    Social disadvantage, mental illness and predictors of legal involvement.

    International journal of law and psychiatry·2005
    Same author

    Life is like an onion.

    Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry·2003
    Same author

    Forensic psychiatry and epidemiology: introduction.

    International journal of law and psychiatry·2001
    Same author

    Childhood and adult victimization as risk factor for major depression.

    International journal of law and psychiatry·2001
    Same author

    Impact of legal reforms on length of forensic assessments in Alberta, Canada.

    International journal of law and psychiatry·2001

    Area of Science:

    • Forensic Psychology
    • Legal Studies
    • Criminal Law

    Background:

    • Challenges persist in establishing a widely accepted legal standard for criminal responsibility.
    • Existing legal frameworks often struggle to accommodate the complexities of mental states in criminal culpability.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To examine the difficulties in creating a universally accepted criminal responsibility test.
    • To analyze the application and implications of Canadian criminal law, specifically Section 16 and Section 215.
    • To explore alternative legal avenues for addressing emotional conditions affecting intent.

    Main Methods:

    • Literature review and legal analysis of criminal responsibility tests.
    • Examination of Canadian Criminal Code Sections 16 and 215.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparative analysis of legal standards and courtroom practices.

    • Main Results:

    • Canadian Section 16 is identified as a modified M'Naghten rule, presenting its own application challenges.
    • The strictures of the M'Naghten rule have led to the development of alternative legal approaches.
    • Section 215 of the Criminal Code provides a legal basis for considering emotional states that impair intent formation.

    Conclusions:

    • The M'Naghten rule, even in disguised forms like Section 16, poses significant challenges in assessing criminal responsibility.
    • Section 215 offers a crucial legal pathway for defendants whose intent may be affected by emotional conditions.
    • Further legal and psychological research is needed to refine tests of criminal responsibility and their application.